Joe_L Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Do I need anything special to see proms? Do you need Ha etc? What's the best magnification?I've got a NExstar 6Se and Baader solar film. A couple of times when people have reported good proms I've put the scope out to have a look and seen nothing. I get a great view of the entire disk with a well defined edge, and good sunspots. On Saturday I even saw some mottling around one of the sunspot groups, but nothing around the edge looking like flares or proms. Was I just too late - do they disspappear quickly?Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirkSteele Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Unfortunately to see such features requires a dedicated hydrogen-alpha solar scope such as those from Lunt, Coronado or Daystar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 You need a Ha scope, it is the narrow part of the spectrum that enable proms to be seen.As to magnification, not a clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_L Posted June 2, 2014 Author Share Posted June 2, 2014 aHa! (sorry!) That explains it. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyKoval35 Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Yes, You need Ha filter.No offense, but the first thing you need is a minimum of knowledge about the Sun, prominences, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Magnification does not need to be high, I regularly look at the sun at a mere 16.7 or 20x and can spot them with my Lunt Solar scope (35mm). They are not cheap, but you may find decent deals second-hand (mine was). There may be a spate of second-hand LS35 scopes as people upgrade to the new (and very promising) LS50. The Coronado PST is another good starter scope should you want to dive in to the H-alpha side of solar observation (or imaging). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_L Posted June 2, 2014 Author Share Posted June 2, 2014 How are these scopes different? Can you just add an Ha filter to an ordinary scope?Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 How are these scopes different? Can you just add an Ha filter to an ordinary scope?JoeYou can in principle, as long as it is a VERY narrow-band H-alpha filter (<0.07 nm, rather than 7nm which is already considered narrowband in DSO filters). You also need an energy rejection filter at the front of the scope (or halfway down if your scope is a refractor). Lunt, Coronado, Baader, and Daystar among others make them. Prices range from very expensive through eye-watering to downright insane If you want to go down that path you need to know exactly what you are doing, or if you are lucky you will only destroy your scope. If you are unlucky you will lose an eye as well. Again, it is doable, but you need to take proper precautions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uplooker Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 No, you can't just add a ha filter to any scope. In really basic terms there are a couple of components that enable you to view the Sun in the H-alpha wavelength. First - a suitable energy rejection filter (ERF) and secondly an etalon. The etalon isolates the H-alpha wavelength (which is near infra-red) 653.2nm.If you are not familiar with the mechanics, probably best to buy an off the shelf solution from Lunt, Coronado etc.Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_L Posted June 2, 2014 Author Share Posted June 2, 2014 Ok that makes sense. The implication here I presume is that standard solar film doesn't let Ha through so you need other ways of reducing the energy - is that correct? And don't worry I am listening to the warnings and not about to try DIY, I'm just wanting to understand why people use different types of scopes. Oh well, a second hand Ls35 will have to join all the other thingss at the bottom of the shopping list....Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Baader film rejects all wavelengths equally, whereas an ERF rejects everything except one or more narrow bands around wavelengths of interest. Good ones are interference filters which reflect the excess energy. Older or cheaper ones absorb much of the excess energy, which is fine if they are mounted in front of the scope, but less so when they sit further down the optical path. Some way behind the ERF lies the etalon, which uses interference to let through a series of wavelengths (its transmission spectrum looks like a comb with very narrow teeth where it passes light. Finally a blocking filter selects the one transmission peak you want (H-alpha or Ca-K). In either case, you end up with an optical system that lets through a tiny fraction (in the order of 0.001%) of the light, but in the Baader film case (or indeed Herschel wedge plus filter case), all wavelengths are attenuated in the same way, whereas in the H-alpha case you reject everything except that one desired wavelength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.