Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Some more Lums from the past couple of nights M63, M92, M64, M101, M13


ChrisLX200

Recommended Posts

I'm just adding more subs on these targets as they come into a favourable position for me to image. I'm using a TV NP127is refractor mounted on a G11/Gemini, guided with a Pronto+Lodestar. The number of subs varies from 5 to 10 but they were all 10min long and stacked using DSS.

M63: The Sunflower galaxy, rather a small target for a 5" refractor @ f/5.2 - needs more focal length and more aperture. Still, small but sweet :)

M63_L-8-bit_zps0de8cd24.jpg

M92: This glob is a much tighter ball of stars than, say, M13, so it's difficult to control the core which is bright and tends to get burned out. Had to post-process this in StarTools to show the core.

M92-L-8-bit_zps645b0cdf.jpg

M64: The Blackeye galaxy, rather bland and featureless at this focal length but at least the dark dust lanes are obvious.

M64-L-8-bit_zpsaf733e28.jpg

M101: This is a crop of the full size image I posted earlier, but after adding a few more subs. I have the full colour data now and am processing the result. It would benefit from some Ha so may wait util I have that done before posting again.

M1018-bit2crop_zpscf33510b.jpg

M13: The Great Hercules Cluster, I also have full colour data on this but try as I might I can't get good star colours from it :( A lack of post-processing competance on my part rather than a fault with the data, although the stars are near saturated.

M13_Lum_cloneb_zps1cf4ae6e.jpg

ChrisH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.