Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Your mak-experiences


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Maybe the MAK102 has many of the characteristics of Sir Patrick's "Three-inch Refractor"? :D

I always imagine that was an 80mm / f=1000mm achromat??? Lose a little light in MAK mirrors,

gain in colour correction and portability? Back to my 1963 "Observer's Book of Astronomy"! ;)

I've often thought the same; bit of aperture loss due to meniscus front end, lack of snazzy coatings inside (I'm sure we'd be inundated with supplier acronyms if they did) so refraction/reflection loss, secondary diffraction....

I set about trying to find out once but trawling through the sources online you often find yourself in theoretical arguments that take the fun away. Better to go outside and look at something :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.