LP Filter or UHC....

[eddy]

Ok so im looking at getting some filters, to be honest the LP around me isnt 'THAT' bad, and was wandering what would be better use to me, a LP filter? or a UHC filter?

This is for imaging by the way and no observing I find that my images 45sec @ ISO1600 are a little washed out.....

Many thanks!

[Viv]

First one I bought was the LP.

Where are you in the Midlands ?? I'm fairly lucky & on the right side of Coventry, but still need the LP filter.

Just for a comparision have a look at this thread (also mine are washed out - but due to the moon at the mo).

http://stargazerslounge.com/diy-astronomer/179610-pollution-solution.html

[eddy]

Im in Bewdley just outside of Worcester, its not a massive town but can still get some orange glow up here.

That thread is amazing and just goes to show the difference! Think ill be getting the LPFilter now I think it'll help no end and give the images a bit mroe contrast, is that right?

OR, would i be better off getting a UHC filter do you think?

[Viv]

I'm really no expert, but i'd get the LP, as it should allow you to take the longer subs.

Then the UHC at a later date, this will just make the nebula clearer.

I have the LP filter & will be trying some nebula first, then getting the UHC in a few months time.

[eddy]

Sounds a good plan to me! Didnt even think about it improving sub length! lol but yeah that makes sense now someones mentioned it!

Thanks again!