Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M33 "pop art" (a little mishap)


Astrogeordie

Recommended Posts

Last Tuesday (2011 Nov 22) evening we had a clear spell. Hence I opened up my shed to point the 10" GSO-RC on the EQ6 pro towards M33. Later the Crab nebula was on the agenda but it clouded up after one hour. :)

On the other EQ6, the OMC250 revealed on Jupiter that the seeing was atrocious. Apart from the two main cloud stripes, no detail emerged and I just used this occasion for a coarse optical alignment.

Back to M33. Next day saw me reducing the data with DeepSkyStacker and Canon Digital Photo Professional. Hence I pointed DSS to the Biases, Darks, Flats and Lights and off it went. 27 x 2 minutes - I could not expect a deep image but howay as the Geordie says.

When contrasting with the Canon software I got surprised:

m33_rc_40d_201s_27ksWRONGFLAT_l800.jpg

What has happened ?

Was the self made stop at the secondary of the GSO still not large enough, so I got straylight intake ?

Will I ever get proper flats ?

Is my technique with the pillow case - multi layered over the front of the scope, held in place with elastic band and shone at with my white LED torch - inappropriate ?

Looking at the flats .... one of them seemed a bit out but I was not sure. So let's try it and remove it from the stack. Going to DSS, I could not find the file name !

Actually there were no flats with the file names of last night, but flats were there !

Only ...

... I am a SAUSAGE ! :)

The flats I chose were - in total error - of another night one month ago, taken with another camera through another telescope (200/1000mm Newtonian) !

After this "small correction" ...

m33_rc_40d_121s_27av_l800.jpg

or a brighter version (depends on screen ...):

m33_rc_40d_121s_27me_l800.jpg

I hope you like it a bit. My partner found the "colourful" version nicer - but this is rather down to an arty taste than astronomy I suppose. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

thanks for your comments. Yes, the amount of detail is not bad for 54 minutes. However, it is a 250mm instrument - not to forget.

@Ben - is it a 250/1200 ? Should be a nice powerful instrument then - I have a self made one of this size. However, for photography I would put a coma corrector onto your wishlist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops, what happened there.

Are the blue lines indeed introduced by DSS ?

Never had one of those. I just remember problems with wide angle exposures where one side of the image "ran away" as the stars formed trails, while the other side was okay ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.