Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

more colour/levels help?


Recommended Posts

ifve been using gimp for the first time trying to process my first couple of images. ive been following this as a basic guide

Astronomy Shed UK Astronomy Forum • View topic - Superb Processing Tutorial

but i wonder if anyone can help me get rid of the bright white area in the bottom right of my pic? not sure what to do or how to do it.

thanks, tom.

1st pic is straight from dss with levels adjusted. 2nd is from gimp after a little more playing around.

post-25906-133877615548_thumb.jpg

post-25906-133877615554_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like unwanted light so is it LP, a light leak or an accidental illumination near the setup?

In general flats take these out but this looks very concentrated in one corner so I'd have thought it wiould be a source visible at the site. Street lighting etc.

When you take darks does the same corner show a glow?

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it would indeed be light pollution. not a nearby streetlamp but an illuminated building on campus. i was quite far away from it but its still affected the image. guess il have to go to a darker site next time.

darks... i havent even added any darks. shoudl i? i thought they were only for hot pixels. and flats.. no idea sorry!

i do have not an incling of what im doing here :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom

Every time you take a photo and save it, it creates noise. Darks help eliminate it.

Flats help remove imperfections in the optical train (e.g. dust bunnies & vignetting). You need an even light source for them, but this can by synthesized by stretching a white T shirt over the end of the scope. The most important thing is not to alter anything (e.g. focus) in the optical train.

HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah dp i do, brought solely on the recommendation of what seems liek every other member here! :) - it came the other day but ive sidelined it cos i also got some pop science books and i wasnt really going to start imaging until i get home in a couple of weeks.

maybe i should get reading.. :icon_eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my result after 30 sec in photoshop (as i'm falling asleep here, and want to go to bed, lol):

what i did was simple:

open pic -> add new duplicate layer -> on new layer, add gaussian blur untill all stars have wanished -> on blured layer, select difference -> set layer to ~90% in this case (different from pic to pic), so pic looks more or less even luminated.

Now, this can be doen at least 20x better, but shows how easy you can do it in PS to get an ok pic in a few sec, or a quite good pic in 10-30 min if ti's a lot of details in the pic.

not sure if this helped you anything, but...

post-22179-133877619092_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst tinkering with your image in CS3 it looked as though I should be looking at part of the Milky Way so I pushed the background as far as possible without going too 'blobby'............. came up with this.

Please tell me I have not made a complete *** of myself.:)

post-13495-133877619368_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no no i love it :) i am so amazed at how much detail was captured and what can be brought of an image! ##i have no idea how to use image processing software so its all mystical to me, and i love seeing peoples attemts at processing an image :)

thanks very much B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.