Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Ouroboros

Members
  • Posts

    3,533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ouroboros

  1. 23 minutes ago, AndyThilo said:

    Thanks!. It's HOO in the sense that my filter only allows Ha and Oiii through so there is no Sii. But I use a script in Pixinsight which lets me play with the colour palette in real time and tweak till I'm happy. I'm not really happy with the background on this and am re-doing it, it's almost clipped, i.e pure black. 

    Thanks for the explanation.I need to get into all this.

    As for background I see what you’re saying, but I’m not sure it matters. If anything because the nebula is so much the majority of the image the dark background makes a useful contrast.  But it might be interesting to see what the image looks like with a less ‘clipped’ background. 
     

     

  2. 1 hour ago, irandar said:

    I was able to connect my iPhone SE2 and activate ASIAIR mini by turning off the phone's Mobile Data. Some phones call it cellular data. Since this phone does not remain connected to the Internet, I needed to turn off the AIR and reconnect to the Internet. But for this to succeed the Mobile Data needed to be off. Hope this helps somebody. 

    Hello, Irandar. Yes, I have read others saying what you did helps.  It didn’t help in my problem  as it happens which was solved as described in the post prior to yours. 

  3. Just as an aside - I connect my ASI2600MC to one USB3 socket and plug my SanDisk flash disk into the other USB3 socket on the ASIair. I connect my ASIair to the AM5 wirelessly. That means I’ve only got one wire - the power cable - between the ASIair and the mount. 

  4. 30 minutes ago, Elp said:

    Those are for the 12v out ports. I'm wondering where in the UI it tells you what is usb 2 and 3 when connected.

    It’s on the UI page for each camera.   It’s next to the displayed name of the camera being used.

    I just tried disconnecting and reconnecting my ZWO ASI2600 camera on that page and it came back as USB3, which it should. So I couldn’t reproduce what Mistuk is seeing, in this way anyway. 

  5. I don't know if you can see this mobile phone pic, but this is what I could see just after I set up for an evening of astrophotography.  Those light beams stretched right overhead. 

    IMG_4116.thumb.JPG.8a5549c7c0880c382ad4293aefbffd2c.JPG

    Some kind of light show in the town consisting of bright search-light like beams flashing and dancing across the sky.  I don't know.  Shakes head in despair. It's a reasonably clear night, the Moon is out of the way, and some nerks insist on flashing lights around.   Fortunately I am using a dual band  so I'm hoping it won't affect things. But anyone doing visual or broadband might be miffed to say the least. 

    • Sad 6
  6. Wow! That is a fantastic image. You really have pulled out the detail in the dust.  Nice to see the bubble so well. 

    Personally, and this isn’t a criticism because it’s all a matter of personal taste, I don’t like the colour pallet. But then, I instinctively react against false colour astrophotography unless it’s for justifiable scientific reasons. I know that’s against the current trend, but there you are.  That’s my view.

    Given the obviously good quality of your data, have you considered processing it more realistically?  Might be interesting. The crescent nebula looks like you’ve got lots of OIII there. Keeping Ha as red and OIII as green/blue might look very striking. 

  7. Interesting. I was wondering whether doing some initial stretch to the whole image followed by star separation might have provided a better approach.

    I had to look up DDP as I have not come across it. It is available in Pixinsight, but seems to be considered obsolete compared with other methods. That’s not to say it is in the applications you’re using of course, and anyway seems to work for you. 

  8. Very nice colours and nice image generally. You must have been up half the night processing. It is a fascinating set of objects  though isn’t it?

    Coincidentally I had another go at widefield imaging the whole Cygnus Loop last night.   I packed in about 11pm after getting three hours of data. I want to get a few more hours of data before processing.

    I had my first go at dual band imaging this region a few days ago. How did you find separating processing the stars?   I found stretching the stars to give a satisfactory star field difficult. Did you separate the stars at the linear or nonlinear stage? 

  9. Surprisingly we had clear(ish) skies here yesterday evening.  I was beginning to give up hope of ever testing my new Askar Colour Magic 6nm dual-band filter with my recently acquired Askar FRA300 I posted on in October. 

    Inevitably perhaps the first target had to be the Cygnus Loop.  I should really have framed it differently.  I've chopped off some of the object at the bottom of the picture. But I didn't know whether I was going to get 20 minutes of clear sky or several hours. So I just went for it and in the end managed a modest 71 x 120s  reasonable subs out of 85 or so.  

    I found my first process of dual-band interesting, and need to study how to do this rather better.  Stars in particular were a bit of a challenge.  Using  an unfiltered star field would probably be better I imagine.   

    CygnusLoop_1500x997.thumb.jpg.dcbdd50657440e063577d9457439a8e5.jpg

    • Like 6
  10. 22 hours ago, wimvb said:

    The stf is much too aggressive for a permanent stretch. It’s function is to show as much detail in a linear image as possible. It does this by bringing in the black point and white point and moving the mid point to achieve maximum contrast. If stf is applied permanently, you suddenly need to fix things that didn't need fixing before.

    It is too aggressive.  It took me a long time to realise this fact.  Unfortunately a lot of introductory videos use the STF/Histogram as the standard method to stretch to non-linear.  So you sort of assume that's the correct way. They should really carry a health warning.  For a while now I've been using GHS as my go to stretcher. 

  11. OK. So this is my most recent effort after reviewing some of your comments.  I think I’m still struggling but at least the blotchiness in my initial attempt has largely disappeared, and I’ve managed to pull up some of the background not unlike your various examples.  I could go on fiddling with it for example by attenuating the noise a tad more. Incidentally I didn’t start applying noise reduction until towards the end.  Anyway, thanks for all your help everyone. NGC281_jpg.thumb.jpeg.78369503197d5358496a8cc6b6839038.jpeg

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.