Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

nightfisher

Members
  • Posts

    14,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by nightfisher

  1. For the first time in about 18 months i have just pointed a scope at the night sky, quick look at Jupiter, i think this is the first time i have viewed a planet in about 2 years, did not last long as the cloud swallowed it up, skymax 127 on AZ4 with 18mm BGO and 12mm starguider....and Anteres 40mm plossl to find it an sort finder scope

    • Like 5
    • Confused 1
  2. Basically they only respond to nights of good seeing conditions, when conditions are very good so are the views when seeing conditions are average the views wont be very good, if you could find one a Russian made maksutov would be a far better buy, and if i was looking at this size scope i would buy the Skywatcher skymax 150

    • Thanks 1
  3. I would be thinking a car battery, maybe rig up some kind of carry strap to make it easy to move about, but i favour rc plane lipo`s as i already have all the charging gear, though these days all i power is EQ5 with twin dc motors so use an 1800mah 2s lipo with 6volt ubec, so small i velcro it to one of the legs of tripod

  4. Yep, started watching the sky at night back in the early 70`s along with the moon apollo missions and the rest is history, started a life long interest in the heavens above, i sometimes take a break from astro but always come back to it, like now im back after taking a break, just checked the maksutov and it has faired well for its layup, just need the weather to play fair

    • Like 2
  5. 9 hours ago, Mr Spock said:

    The best view I had of Saturn (when it was overhead), was through an OMC-140. That has an aperture of 140mm and a primary of 150mm. I expect a Skymax 150 would be similar in size - can anyone confirm this?

    When Mr Spock decided to part with this OMC 140 i snapped it up, this was many years ago, i kept it for about a year but as others have said,  it seemed this model was very prone to under performing on average nights, then when seeing was very good the scope would amaze me.

    I have owned a huge amount of scopes, seeking that "Holy grail", amazingly i found it after re purchasing a skymax 127, i had purchased this scope at a time when i had a nice Tal 100rs and a skymax 150 so the poor little 127 did not really get used and i sold it on, then a few years and many scopes later i had the chance to buy this back, its now my only scope and i really like it, if any thing happened to it i would have to have another 127

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  6. 9 hours ago, jock1958 said:

    Very interesting Jules. 

    What’s the difference between the 100R and 100RS Mk 1 apart from purple coatings on their lenses and rack and pinion focusers? 

    The 100r, had the same purple coated objective lens as the Mk 1 rs, but had the small 1.25 focuser with rather limited travel, the 100r also had a slim metal dewshield, held with tiny set screws 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. I still feel that the finest Tal 100 was the Mk 1 100RS, this model had the purple objective lens, had a 2" rack an pinion focuser, and an early version of the plastic dew shield, i think this came with the EQ5 and wooden leg tripod, then the mk 2 RS came out as OTA option, with the kinda green objective lens and a larger plastic dew shield, and of course the 2" crayford focuser

    • Like 3
  8. So the outer planets are gas giants, when comet Shoemaker-levy struct Jupiter back in 1994, each part of the comet created a huge impact, resulting in an explosion on impact, but if the planet is a gas giant i would of thought the parts of comet would pass right through, why is this?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.