Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

mcrowle

Members
  • Posts

    348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mcrowle

  1. While I await a night suitable for deep sky imaging here in Cornwall (6 weeks now, and counting), I intend to re-process more existing data to include Starnet++ steps. 

    The following image was created with data captured in 2019 during an excellent landscape astrophotography workshop with the late Alyn Wallace, in Tenerife. Here the location was Minas de San Jose, at the foot of Mount Teide. The exposure details were 13 x 30-second exposures at f/2.8 and ISO 6400, taken with an astro-modified Canon EOS 600D and Leica Summicron 50mm f/2 lens on a Vixen Polarie star tracker.

    The second version has been re-visited with Starnet++, but I also reduced the stars in the star layer using Noel Carboni’s tools in an ancient version of Photoshop Elements. So maybe I’ve overdone the star reduction - the spectacular clusters M6 and M7 won’t thank me for that! Still, the dark and emission nebulae show up well.

    Regards, Mike.

    IMG_0272.jpeg

    Cats Paw region 50mm combined ee-01-1-01-1.jpeg

    • Like 5
  2. Lots of tributes to Alyn under his last YouTube video: 

    I was fortunate enough to be able to join him on a landscape astrophotography workshop in Tenerife in 2019. Such a great experience that I would have loved to repeat. I never got around to posting about it on StargazersLounge, though - I returned with so much data that by the time I worked through it I felt that the moment had passed.

    RIP, Alyn.

    Mike

     

    • Like 2
  3. As mentioned, I headed out to the footpath (thankfully now less muddy) last night for another look at Pons-Brooks. I'm not sure after all whether the transparency was better, as unfortunately there were now a couple of floodlights affecting my night vision at the location (they appeared to be illuminating an entirely deserted outdoor basketball court). 

    Despite this, the comet was easily visible in the 7 x 50s, and the tail was clearly longer in the photo frames. Here's a slightly cropped 135mm lens image, which is from a stack of 22 x 30 sec frames (with Starnet++ having been employed to temporarily remove the stars before stretching the contrast).

    Regards, Mike.

    Pons-Brooks 135mm combined c-01-5.jpg

    • Like 7
  4. 2 hours ago, PeterStudz said:

    Fabulous sketches! Sadly the view to this is totally obscured from my house. Might give a go at looking somewhere else. That’s if we ever get a clear evening. 

    Yes, I have to do the same as I cannot see westwards from my observing location. There are some places along (currently very muddy) footpaths nearby that I can observe from with binoculars, and/or image with a star tracker and short telephoto.

    This was the comet last night, the tail showing nicely to the camera (though not to the eye, via 7 x 50s).

    Regards, Mike.

    Pons-Brooks 5 March 2024.jpg

    • Like 7
  5. I too had another look at Pons-Brooks tonight, with 7 x 50 binocs.

    Although it has brightened apparently since I last viewed it on 29 February, it was not easy to pick out due to the rather murky conditions. Shortly afterwards, low cloud moved in, so I was glad I hadn’t set for the planned deep sky session!

    Regards, Mike.

    • Like 1
  6. Only a brief session - my first of February (good job it's a leap year :) ).

    Viewed Comet 12P Pons-Brooks via good intervals between shower clouds, easily in 7 x 50 binocs, from a local footpath (as I cannot reach its location from my telescopic observing location).

    Regards, Mike.

    • Like 7
  7. A wonderful report and photos, Nicola!

    Brings back a few memories for me  - and a regret. I was lucky enough to visit the observatory during a walking holiday in the region back in 1998. I remember queuing to view the Moon through the 24” Clark, but when it came to my turn I looked at the wobbly view (due to turbulence) for about half a second, said “thanks” to the staff member managing the viewing, and walked off. I should have savoured the view through such a classic instrument for a little longer at least! 😄

    Regards, Mike.

    • Like 1
  8. 2 minutes ago, glafnazur said:

    It was lovely and clear when I got home, I had something to eat and just looked out and now there's a layer of high cloud.

    Yes, similar here in Cornwall. Very clear from mid-afternoon, with all forecasts showing it staying so until later in the evening. I set up about 6:45pm but have a lot of thin cloud ever since.

    Regards, Mike.

    • Like 1
  9. Been lucky enough to have had a full week of mainly clear skies here in mid Cornwall, though the clouds have returned now.

    The wind gusts caught me by surprise on Wednesday evening, though. I clearly hadn't paid enough attention to the forecast, and had set up my 12" Newtonian to image M42. Typically my Total RMS error is around 0.6", but Tuesday it was 2.5"! I've deleted the worst frames, but am hoping to salvage something from the rest 🤞.

    Regards, Mike.

    • Like 2
  10. 17 hours ago, CCD-Freak said:

    Looking forward to seeing your image.  I recently picked up one of those 12" F4 OTAs but have not had much clear sky to test it.

     

     

    Thanks. Here's the result, 31 x 4-minute exposures at ISO 1600 taken over 2 nights.

    Regards, Mike.

    M81 and M82 300mm g.jpg

    • Like 7
  11. 46 minutes ago, Vroobel said:

    It's time to think about a dew heater... 🙂

    Yes, perhaps! I don’t have dew issues here often though. Actually I was imaging the same galaxies tonight with no issues even after several hours. The humidity was certainly lower than last night.

    Regards, Mike.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.