Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

scotty38

Members
  • Posts

    1,926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by scotty38

  1. 36 minutes ago, Adreneline said:

    Why not set APP to save as .fit and retain the header information which PI uses? I didn't think linear tif files retained the .fit header but please tell me if I am wrong.

    Unless it's been fixed in the last few months APP bins most of the fits info in its final images. I had issues with this for ages and asked for it to be looked at. It was on the list to be remedied but don't know if it has yet.

    • Like 2
  2. 17 minutes ago, StuartT said:

    Someone* helpfully suggested a reason I have been having all this trouble. My rig is connected to the laptop via a 15m USB cable. Apparently USB signals can't travel more than a few metres before getting messed up (🤦‍♂️)^2.

    So he suggested I use a mini PC on the telescope and then wifi out to that.

    * thanks @Stuart1971

    Glad you finally listened 🤣🤣🤣 🤣

     

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 12 minutes ago, rnobleeddy said:

    Does this hold for the colour version too? I heard of those issues as I own the QHY mono version right now, but my understanding was there were actually different chips, and QHY fixed at least some of the issue with new firmware.

    The mono is the 492 sensor and the colour the 294. What the fundamental differences are I couldn't tell you.

    I have had the ZWO 294mc and now have a QHY 294m and both need careful calibration frames but once you sort that out the cameras are fine. I had a bit of pain with the 294mc but I was using an l-extreme filter which just adds to it but once sorted (there's a thread on here somewhere) it was great.

    I've only been imaging for just under 2 years and the 294mc was my first camera so it can be done as a beginner no worries.

  4. 1 hour ago, wornish said:

    Just a word of caution these supplies are designed to work indoors and certainly not out in the open. So if you are using it in an observatory then fine, but even then  I would be very concerned about dew forming.  Ideally it should be in a waterproof box. 240V and water don't mix well! 

    Yes I think I already said that....

  5. I'm not sure what plug type the ASIAIR needs but I bought eh Silicon cables from FLO like this:

    https://www.firstlightoptics.com/astronomy-cables-leads-accessories/lynx-astro-silicone-power-cable-25mm-dc-jack.html

    I bought the ones with the ring tongues, one dedicated to my AZ-EQ6 and then one with a 2.1mm end for my Pegasus powerbox.

    When my kit was outside I put the whole shooting match, laptop and PSU in one of the plastic toybox type of box with a lid and no issues at all.

    I probably wouldn't leave it outside naked, certainly not at this time of year anyway. It says it's designed for indoor use on the instructions but they all say that and 90% of astro folk with these will be leaving them outside in some way or other.

  6. It'll work and I've used similar but I can highly recommend both of the Nevada power supplies that FLO sells. Yes they are more money but you can kiss goodbye to any power issues in the future., plus they can be used to power other stuff too.

    Oh and the EQ6 mounts thrive on having more than 12v supplied too which was the issue I had with the brick type especially if you try to run more than just the mount.

    • Like 2
  7. 10 minutes ago, George Sinanis said:

    I managed ove rthe past 2 days to collect 20 hrs (240 x 300secs) of data with the Stellamira ED90 Triplet + Reducer x0.8 + 2600MC. Looking at this. i might need even more subs.....

    You may have better processing skills than me though... I'm just processing the extra 150 frames from last night so will be interesting to see how much difference it makes

  8. 4 hours ago, gorann said:

    Well, it is definitively there, but the light grasp of a RASA8 is 6 times that of your GT81, so you will need more time.

    EDIT: Did you try starless processing? If not, that may get you closer.

    Yes agreed on the RASA and I'm imaging as we speak so hopefully will have double the amount tomorrow.

    No, no starless imaging just a channel combination and stretch. I figured I would need more data so just wanted a quick look at what I had. Will try starless etc tomorrow, thanks.

    • Like 1
  9. 1 hour ago, powerlord said:

    Here's my scale model 'Wendy observatory'.  1:15.

    Scope is my biggest 300pds.

    Shed is a 6x9 metal on on ebay.. I think this will work, but will need limit control for low east or west.

    Everything to scale. Basic eq mount made, so I can move it around and check.

    20221213_203951.jpg

    20221213_203939.jpg

    20221214_124822.jpg

    20221214_124902.jpg

    20221214_125009.jpg

    20221214_125355.jpg

    There is no way that scope is balanced.... Amateur hour.... 🤣😂

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.