Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Varavall

Members
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Varavall

  1. 8 minutes ago, JeremyS said:

    any thoughts? I’m must admit to feeling dry deflated about the prospects

    Hi

    I have astigmatism in both eyes (aging is a bitch!) and visual became so unsatisfying, so I ditched visual (not the advice you were seeking I guess) and went purely photographic. That has probably already crossed your mind, but the benefit is you can sit indoors in the warmth watching TV or doing things while the computer does all the work. Not all bad news!

    Adrian

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 19 minutes ago, ninjageezer said:

    get me off the mark.

    Hi

    Well I would just plug it in as it will connect to NINA without a problem, says he hopefully. Then I would use CCDCiel to get a rough focus point manually, then head for the imaging option tab in NINA and do an autofocus routine to get an idea of the focuser backlash which you can add in to the configuration options for autofocus, then use the "Filter Offset Calculator" in the advanced sequencer. Sounds straight forward, but I've done it!

    Adrian

    PS start with say a step size of 50 and see where you go

    • Like 1
  3. Cave nebula imaged night of 2nd October in RGB-HSO.

    SW 200pds; ZWO ASI 1600MM-cool; filters: Astrodon Tru-balance RGB; Astrodon 5nm Ha, Optolong 7.5nm Oiii and Sii (30 x 60s R; 10 x 60s G; 5 x 60s B; 10 x 180s  each Ha, Sii & Oiii). Calibrated, aligned and stacked in ASTAP; processed in APP; final touches in GIMP.

    Cave-RGBHSO-St2-s2.thumb.jpg.8813641e8823920e6cedf17a1b44c6da.jpg

    • Like 5
  4. 5 hours ago, vlaiv said:

    I'd recommend ASI462 (or QHY or some other version) to people that are interested in IR planetary (or IR guiding), but there are probably higher QE cameras in visible part of spectrum than that one.

    Maybe ASI662 for example (peak QE in green around 91%)?

    Or if blue QE is important, then maybe ASI678 (peak QE in blue around 83%)?

    Hi

    That's all very interesting. Could you post images you have made with each of those cameras so we can see what you are getting at?

  5. 36 minutes ago, Astroblagger said:

    . Iv clicked on the com port selection box binocular symbol it then displays com 16. Iv went to my device manager windows 7. But I can't see the com port anyway in the lists

    Take read of this thread 

    As you are at Port 16 which is the limit for eqmod, maybe the mount is being assigned port 17 or higher. Just a thought.

  6. 2 minutes ago, yelsac said:

    Just wondered if you have had a go with the 462 on planetary?

    Not yet. I am waiting for the planets to be at a good altitude at a reasonable hour (I like my sleep) so I progamme my setup for DSO's to work while I'm asleep. Now when the next Moon comes I will start with the planets anew.  So in a couple of weeks or so, I will have the answer. In the meantime it's a fantastic guide camera!

  7. 56 minutes ago, Bargee said:

    I’m using a Nikon 7200 which has a fixed screen.

    Hi

    I assume the camera is the D7200, in which case it should have internal wifi so you can connect to a phone, iOS or Android, with the Nikon wireless mobility app. You can get live view that way, but not sure it's going to work with a dim DSO. You can also connect to a laptop via USB from the camera and use something like Digicam Control (free). That way you can get live view and maybe adjust the gain sufficiently to see what it's pointed at. Failing that, take a pic and see what you got and adjust the telescope approriately. Focus on a bright star before slewing to the DSO, that makes life easier. I started out that way with a D5300 with some success.

  8. On 19/09/2022 at 20:45, Astronix said:

    what I want to buy is,

    1. ASI Air Plus

    For my 2p worth, personally I would go for a Pegasus Powerbox as I don't like being locked into a single manufacturer's products. But for the moment I just run long cables into the house, cheaper and works well as long as the cable run is done well, of course that leaves more budget for the stuff that actually takes the images.

     

    On 19/09/2022 at 20:45, Astronix said:

    A red/white head torch.

    Are you actually going to stand by the scope and watch it? If you ae imaging and retreating indoors once set up, any old cheap torch would do.

     

    For £2000 why not go for a used ASI2600MC Pro with 2" filter drawer at £1600, then add an EAF (£190 new, less second hand) and filter (£130 new)  and that will leave you £80 to take your wife out for a good dinner or to buy some appropriate, loving gift.

  9. 30 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

    Is there any performance bonus with the wo option?

    There is a thread on this over on Cloudynights https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/782348-william-optics-slide-base-guide-scopes/ 

    I used to guide with the SW finder that you are currently using and it gave good results. I went for an 80mm TS finder/guider; so many stars! It also gave me a better camera/guide canera pixel ratio. Pay your money and take your choice.

  10. 33 minutes ago, andymw said:

    Just saw this photo and thought I would mention that you can flip those focusser wheels so that your EAF doesn't stick out of the front.  You could also ditch the finder scope and add an OAG thus getting rid of the guide scope.  

    Thanks for the comments, but the EAF works just fine that way round, but to use an OAG with my guide camera would just put extra stress on the focuser, not to mention all that work with back focus and no doubt more expense. As my setup gives me PHD2 RMS of 0.3-0.9, depending on seeing, I can do 15 minute subs without problems. So as they say, if it ain't broke don't fix it!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.