R3tr0

He did not say, he just thought I would like them. I would assume there is some cropping going on but don't know. I have asked for setup details used on the images .

These images were take just last week with the Redcat, supplied via William Yang. Stunning!

Hi While I did have further conversations with William Yang, I did not receive permission to post any of the emails he sent me, this is understandable considering we were discussing the video I linked from you tube. He is very passionate concerning this scope and I don't think he will mind me quoting that "I consider the Redcat 51 our best product from the past 22 years since WO established in 1996.". So I think he has more than a little confidence in the Redcat. I look forward to recieving this scope!

Good point, I will check with him.

Hi, I have a reply from William Yang and would like to post on here (quite reassuring) but the text appears black so doesn't show with black background, any way to change this ? It is quite a long mess age.

That would be great thank you Dave!

Thank you for the comment Alan, I am currently using a Sony A7R3 and a 100 to 400 G-Master and samyang 14mm for astro and while the 100 to 400 is a sharp lens for wildlife and also great for motionless wildlife manually, I find for astro it is very hard to focus due to the "focus by wire" nature which is why I decided to purchase the Redcat (not yet available, which has given me time to pause). Indecently, I have also pointed William Yang to the video because there is a general negative vibe towards the Redcat. What would you suggest scope wise, would you stick with the cat or go for something different?

I have one of the redcat's on order but have just seen this video - https://youtu.be/5w5l6gwdjmg and I am curious if there is anyone with an opposing opinion ?