Anthony1979
-
Posts
841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Anthony1979
-
-
9 minutes ago, alacant said:
Increase Size X
Just the X or do i unlink it... Because Y changes with it
-
-
On 27/04/2020 at 10:51, alacant said:
Hi
GIMP? To remove vignetting and gradient. Quick method.
Layers:
Duplicate the layer
Blur the layer until you see no stars
Invert the blurred layer
Merge it. I found around 14% did it.
Merge down the layers
Re-adjust the levels
Experiment with layers, %, layer masks, masked stretches
You could also consider getting an astro processing program but learning GIMP first would be my recommended method; you're in total control rather than the computer;)
HTH
I cant work out how to Blur the Duplicate image.... Sorry for the bother but im thick when it comes to this
-
4 hours ago, alacant said:
Hi
GIMP? To remove vignetting and gradient. Quick method.
Layers:
Duplicate the layer
Blur the layer until you see no stars
Invert the blurred layer
Merge it. I found around 14% did it.
Merge down the layers
Re-adjust the levels
Experiment with layers, %, layer masks, masked stretches
You could also consider getting an astro processing program but learning GIMP first would be my recommended method; you're in total control rather than the computer;)
HTH
Looks really complicated that... Thank you for getting this far.. Think i would had given up by now.... It is really hard work isnt it
- 1
-
-
-
OK here is the lights only stack
-
1 minute ago, david_taurus83 said:
Yes
Even though RGB graph isnt aligned
-
-
-
-
-
I deleted everything ive stacked in frustration so im just restacking the lights only....
Is there a certain setting i should be using in dss.. I am using an unmodded dlsr
-
1 minute ago, alacant said:
Hi
The single frame looks pretty good to me.
Thats what i thought this is why im trying not to give up on it.... To me it seem theres detail there
-
8 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:
What software are you using to process after it's been stacked in DSS?
I use GIMP 2.10
-
29 minutes ago, alacant said:
Hi
The single flat frame shows off centre optics. The master-flat less so. the dust has been removed so in that respect, the flat frames are working. The stack shows intense gradient which is not present on the -quite nice- single frame. It looks like there was a change in orientation and /or light leak into camera or telescope when you took the flat frames.
It's rescuable, but it needed a big hammer to remove the irregularities. I fixed the stars whilst I was at it; there seems to be coma toward the edges.
Anyway, HTH and stay safe.
I did accidently remove camera when i was packing everything up forgetting i had to take flats then put it back on.... So is this where i went wrong ( bad mistake)
-
So it is down to my flats being bad
-
I will do a stack of just lights
-
2 minutes ago, Anthony1979 said:
Ive never had this problem from my back yard... Ive done all my imaging from my back yard and this is the first problem ive had...
The one i put on saying stacked lights was with flats darks and bias. Its not just lights sorry
- 1
-
-
28 minutes ago, Anthony1979 said:
stacked lights
Sorry this is a full stack of lights,flats,darks and bias... The pic above
-
stacked lights
-
master flat
-
single light frame
At a loss here
in Getting Started With Imaging
Posted
think this is the best im going to get it.... But it still doesnt look right to me..