Jump to content

scotty1

Members
  • Posts

    482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by scotty1

  1. Two more from 6-2-23

    Not sure if I also picked up C/2022 U2 atlas , the photos are too noisy to tell, and a near full moon. Single exposures iso 6400 20 seconds for first pic. Second pic 10 seconds 300mm zoom.

    IMG_20230207_010313_(1450_x_1062_pixel).thumb.jpg.ab9abed718960be463ac80b6307a7fcb.jpg

    IMG_20230208_020821_(2000_x_1334_pixel).thumb.jpg.310b302b9ecb6e5d792fb75408d43c4c.jpg

    IMG_20230207_010123_(1600_x_1297_pixel).thumb.jpg.3dfbb062091fbb7a56a430ac0c5263d9.jpg

     

    From the 7th before moonrise, the seeing was poor. Trying to find C/2022 U2 atlas near star ETA about 18.45 GMT . Too many stars and CA 

    IMG_20230208_010740_(3000_x_2001_pixel).thumb.jpg.b89ac89eb9b1f4b7cac8cc668d97d559.jpg

    Comet C/2022 E3 ZTF 

    IMG_20230208_005955_(2000_x_1334_pixel).thumb.jpg.650220c4249a8f506732f82e877fad6e.jpg

    7879110.thumb.jpeg.7d0716ff8a95a9a7d59a7bde45f31375.jpeg

    IMG_20230208_021052_(1098_x_1100_pixel).jpg.04b9efb63e11a765d530b37e9df60b00.jpg

     

    • Like 1
  2. 24 minutes ago, pipnina said:

    This might explain why my dad and I were struggling to see it, stellarium on mobile has it as mag 5.8, I was struggling to see the comet but mag 8, 9 stars were easy in my 10x50s tonight.

    This is from mobile Android, a bit confusing really...

    Screenshot_20230207-001323.thumb.png.2c63e47c0127fa8313203e9c07b69d0a.png

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, mcrowle said:

    Will be interesting to see if anyone captures this pairing! I've only just read about it, and wasn't planning to set up due to the full moon to be honest.

    However, luckily C/2022 U2 is likely rather brighter, at mag. 11 according to the BAA page at BAA Comet section (cam.ac.uk). I successfully imaged and viewed it in late Jan, despite strong light pollution from the local football club floodlights! 😊

    Regards, Mike.

    Hi Mike

    Yes I've been looking at Cometwatch http://aerith.net/comet/weekly/current.html and it says  magnitude being about 10. On Stellarium it's listed as 16. 

    Took a few shots earlier at 300mm , but the moon and my budget setup (DSLR and zoom lens) maybe asking a bit much.

    • Like 1
  4. Ok so I tried this stack of 10 photos 20 seconds each, iso 6400 and 10 darks in DSS. Its not great and the stars are a bit green. I tried the 2X drizzle setting , not sure if that messed the colours up. This was taken through a 55-300mm zoom at 300mm on 30-1-23

    The stack i tried above before had natural colours, does the drizzle setting effect colours? 

    I processed this in Rawtherepee 5.9 , I haven't used that programme for ages. 

     

    1508133897_AutosavecometE3ZTF1000kb.jpg.10247395efc73cee4d79f33ceb847ba4.thumb.jpg.c496086feeec9a1527bf3f31f7670769.jpg

    1863307988_7854862(1).thumb.jpeg.dee2bad402eeaa28a3ae5e19726247cf.jpeg

    • Like 4
  5. Most people wouldn't notice the light pollution creeping up around them. If they have no interest in looking up, or even have the time. 

    As long as they have nicely lit paths for 24hours, expanding industrial estates blazing lights all night, but supplying jobs. 

    I've noticed the urban expansion along with the lights in the last 20 years. A location that was reasonably dark a few miles from town, with good horizons all round, is now amongst houses, street lights, and industrial units. 

    Each town is expanding, so the areas between town that were good for sky watching, are shrinking. When trying to escape the lights from one town, you just run into the next. 

    Overpopulated maybe?

    • Like 2
  6. 3 hours ago, maw lod qan said:

    Wonderful image Nigella!

    I hoped to get a quick peek at it this morning before work, had the binoculars ready, but it was too cloudy!

    Heavens Above is stay right on it with its position. 

    It is really moving along now, or as we say it out in the country, "it's really scooting a boot!"!

    Or hauling A##e as some US folks say. 

    • Haha 1
  7. I've just picked up C/2020 V2 (ZTF) on a 10 and 20 second exposure with a pentax astrotracer, and 55-300mm zoom on static tripod. 

    Was curious if I could pick it up with basic equipment. It's a bit hazy and humid over the town so not ideal conditions.  

    Stellarium says it was Mag 10.59 

    7734680.thumb.jpeg.334730ed0cf1090dc13ea840f9b3c328.jpeg

    Polish_20230120_213731069.thumb.jpg.0866f67ab4f947e4fe0347a9001ecdde.jpg

    Polish_20230120_212322930.thumb.jpg.25487bfd244808ca9da5b2b707911dcc.jpg

    • Like 6
  8. Woke up at 04.00 am today to check for  C/2022 E3 (ZTF). 

    Clear sky untill about 04.40 am , found the comet easily with a wide 90mm photo shot above Corona Borealis. Then got my bros 10x50 bins and could see the Comet fairly easily. 

    The clouds rolled in after about 30 mins. Quite cold 3.5 C and windy. 

    Quick in camera RAW to JPG 

    Single shot 300mm f5.8 10 seconds ISO 6400 with Pentax K70 + Astrotracer.

    IMG_20230115_184840_(2000_x_1333_pixel).thumb.jpg.bf014483b88a7ec22cd176bbb0023be5.jpg

    7688776.thumb.jpeg.c6c60ffeb8cd3aeb658c2970b4fd5d89.jpeg

    • Like 13
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.