Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Laurin Dave

Members
  • Posts

    1,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Laurin Dave

  1. 11 minutes ago, AbsolutelyN said:

    I'm curious on the spacing. I have just acquired very similar setup - esprit 100 + zwo 1600mm (pro version). I tested it last night and stars looked reasonably ok to me but I'm very new to this. Opinions if it's good/bad spacing much appreciated. I think I can see some elongation in corners. The setup is flattener, zwo 16.5mm spacer, zwo 21mm spacer, mini filter wheel, camera. Quick exposure attached.

    After contacting Skywatcher they can apparently provide thicker felt for the rings. I have exact same issue - the tube just slides through the rings no matter how tight. The washers are in correct place. Not impressed with that at all as rings are basically not ft for purpose as supplied.

    HA.jpg

    With ASI1600 to get 55mm backfocus its flattener then 11mm and 16.5mm spacers FW then camera ie take the 11mm spacer off the front of the camera and connect camera direct to FW. There are diagrams on their website showing how its done.  At the moment you have 65mm.

    Dave

    • Like 1
  2. Canon lenses have 44mm backfocus and the distance from the front face of the camera to the sensor is 6.5mm so the camera adapter plus spacer should total 44-6.5mm i.e. 37.5mm to obtain focus. Have you measured it? Looks like the zwo diagram for the 183 is incorrect in that you do need to use the 11mm female to female spacer as it shows in the diagram for the 1600.  

    For what it worth I have the 1600mono and filter wheel and the appropriate version for Nikon lenses and it focuses fine.

    Dave

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. Hi Nigel,

    Nice image, I had a look at your data last night whilst waiting patiently for my power supply to fail as I imaged the Fireworks galaxy in Ha. To me Dynamic psf in Pixinsight seems to show that the minor elongation gets worse on the Red from top left to bottom right and on the Green and Blue in the opposite direction, also the Blue and Green are generally more elongated. Also when combining RGB and after background neutralisation there is a pronounced  red to green gradient left to right...  So these make me wonder whether you did a meridian flip between red and green/blue and whether you have balance and polar alignment/field rotation issues, I don't know whether you are using an OAG or guidescope or are on a on a permanent pier. 

    Hope this helps

    Dave

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.