serbiadarksky
Members-
Posts
554 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
382 ExcellentProfile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Serbia
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Imaging with a Star Adventurer
serbiadarksky replied to M Astronomy's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
So than I will need a lens collar for my 135mm samyang? Or it will be fine attached to the camera? It weights somewhere around 800g -
Γεια σας and welcome to SGL nice to see more and more people from the Balkans. I live in Serbia and visit Greece every summer Nikola
-
Deep sky imaging showcase 2018
serbiadarksky replied to Uranium235's topic in Imaging - Showcase Threads
How much are the galaxy images cropped? I am sure thats not the real fov as the esprit 150 doesnt have that much fl. -
My journey with the Samyang 135mm
serbiadarksky replied to Adamar98's topic in Imaging - Widefield, Special Events and Comets
Same here! In april also I think I saw your posts on facebook in Star Adventurer group but using a vixen gp? -
Imaging with a Star Adventurer
serbiadarksky replied to M Astronomy's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
+1 on FaDG and I just want to make it more simple, thats being done with camera looking thru small scope called guidescope and a software like PhD2, it centers a star and registers the movement of it. If the star is out of the center the software will tell to you mount to go faster, slower, left right etc.. -
i looked at oag, it can save a bit of money and weight for me, but I have been told that oag cant work with my dslr..
- 4,169 replies
-
- 1
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I knew it is 4.3 or 4.6 haha, just wasnt home to check or to google it
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I use a 1300D, 4.3 or 4.6um, I dont really know
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well than you say that the 130PDS and the EQ5 can be totally ok?
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I know.If i get the bucls I will deff go for the heq5 if not eq6r
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I mean the "perfectly" in terms of weight. About my LP? 21 sqm here in garden, Bortle 4 to be more precise
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well, I respect your words, but I have been told several times that EQ5 and 130PDS can work perfectly for imaging.
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have never heard about guiding issues with eq5, all what I heard was that it cant take a big scope..btw I wanted a 150PDS, now I am concerned about 130PDS and can the mount do ap with it..and at the end I found a guy doing 15min exposures with EQ5 and 200/1000(9.5kg scope) lol..
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I just saw this topic. My first plan was to go for a 150PDS and EQ5 for imaging (with guiding etc) Than I saw the 130PDS and wow I am in love with it! Will it be totally ok to do imaging with the 130PDS instead of 150PDS on EQ5 Pro goto? The 150PDS is just under the limit, so I guess the 130PDS will work perfectly with that mount.
- 4,169 replies
-
- skywatcher
- 130
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Imaging with a Star Adventurer
serbiadarksky replied to M Astronomy's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
It is normal. What I would suggest is to decide what you want. You want to use the L bracket only, or the ballhead only. The 2 together is a pretty heavy combination