Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

HunterHarling

Members
  • Posts

    495
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by HunterHarling

  1. This is a 20 hour LRGBHa exposure of The Fireworks Galaxy that I captured part from the end of July, and last two nights. I was able to pull out some of the dim dust around the Ghost Brush Cluster and some small galaxies. Some of the galaxies in the image: PGC 166192 - MAG 15.15, PGC 64824 - MAG 17.00.

    798767812_Fireworks6946.thumb.jpg.84f6798941ece9ed1321afb6f3c146dd.jpg

    Exposures:

    L: 60x300s

    R, G, B 40x300s each

    Ha: 50x360s

    Total~20 Hours

    ZWO 1600mm

    FSQ106 ED

     

    Questions / comments / processing advice much appreciated!

    Thanks for looking

     

    • Like 29
  2. I captured this beautiful nebula the last couple of days. I'm surprised that there are so few images of this one, as it seems a perfect target with the reflection nebula, star cluster, dark nebula, and faint galaxies behind the dust.

    I was able to pull out some faint nebulae in the background due to my ~30 hours of exposure. I was especially surprised by the interesting H-alpha region covering NGC 7142. Some of the galaxies I've found in this image are PGC 97261 - Mag 12.87, and PGC 168082 - Mag 13.52. 

    FSQ 106 ED

    ASI 1600mm

    L: 72x300s

    RGB: 50x300s each

    H: 110x360s

    Total = 29.5 hours

     

    Questions and comments much appreciated! 

    Hunter

    rev3.thumb.jpg.b85064f79b2f8c9578c46fd7b75c1077.jpg

    H-alpha channel:

    haP1.thumb.jpg.d3cec1d95a88c21fcd72ef0403d44c24.jpg

     

    • Like 12
  3. 1 hour ago, maw lod qan said:

    Very nice!

    Oh how nice it would be to put your eye to an eyepiece and actually see that!

    That's what I thought also. I'll have to do some observing when m31 is a bit higher.

    2 hours ago, Scooot said:

    That’s very impressive :) 

     

    1 hour ago, Nigella Bryant said:

    That's impressive for 30's for each RGB. Well done. 

    The Andromeda Galaxy is a great target for this challenge. Big and bright...

  4. This is composed of a single 30s exposure unguided through each filter (RGB) to make a color image. The noise in this image was very difficult to deal with... but that's what happens when you don't stack🙃 For processing I did lots of noise reduction using TGV denoise, MML, and ADCNR in Pixinsight, stretch image, and curves transformation. 

    Captured 29 July 2019

    FSQ 106

    ZWO1600 mm

    1076435671_m3130sRGB.thumb.jpg.735e342109d31aeb30be45b87e40e1c2.jpg

    Hunter

    • Like 15
  5. On 29/07/2019 at 11:11, Whistlin Bob said:

    Epic!

    If I'd taken that shot I would now be spending a bit of money on a high quality print and hanging it up on my wall!

    I've just had a pleasant few minutes exploring it for various objects- it really is wonderful, thanks for sharing.

    Thanks! I'm definitely going to print this one. I'm glad you like it.

  6. I managed to get a bit of exposure in between sunset and moonrise, so I decided to image M17. This image is only 2.4 hours of exposure and a 'rough' process of M17, but I'm happy with it as it's the first time I've imaged the Swan Nebula. No lum data yet...

    ASI1600mm

    FSQ106

    Atlas Pro AZ-EQG

    ZWO RGB: 180sx16 each, 2.4 hours total.

    There seemed to be a large amount of green in/near the center. I'm not sure if the green is accurate...

    M17Swan.thumb.jpg.163994a0d0449e80ab20d032940611a0.jpg

    Questions/comments always welcome.

    • Like 5
  7. 8 hours ago, davew said:

    Now that is a beauty ! 

    Not only is the arch as good as it gets but the colours are gorgeous. I like the few clouds that have sneaked in and the sky glow.

    Dave 

    Thanks! I also like the clouds and glow:)

     

    7 hours ago, geoflewis said:

    Wonderful image Hunter, thanks for sharing it. I keep thinking I'll try a Milky Way shot, but just never get around to it. Really I need to invest in a widefield prime lens for my astro-modified Canon to do it justice, but perhaps my 18-200mm Nikor lens at 18mm might be worth a try, even though my Nikon camera isn't modified, though it does suffer with serious amp glow at even a few seconds exposure.

    Cheers, Geof

    Thanks, Geof. I've found milky way astrophotography to be really rewarding. It's also fun in a dark sky because you don't have to bring the full setup to get some images! I think you'd be able to get some great images with the modified Canon and any lense less than 25mm would probably work. If you do get a widefield lense, the Tokina ATX 11-16 mm is great for Canon. And the Nikkor 14-24 is great for Nikon...

    2 hours ago, banjaxed said:

    That is a superb image Hunter, thanks for sharing.

    Thanks

    • Like 1
  8. I captured this image while out at Joshua Tree this month. Despite being quite hot and a setting moon, the sky was incredible. This was really the first time I've seen the core of the milky way from a very dark location, because the other times I've been in a good location, the core wasn't visible (wrong time of year or hidden by mountains+trees🙃). This is a 6-panel mosaic captured around midnight PST. There are some light domes near the horizon, along with green/red air glow and clouds.

    Jupiter and Saturn are visible in the image along with the summer triangle, M8, M20, M16, M17, NGC7000, IC1396, the Rho Ophiuchi Complex, and the Andromeda Galaxy.

    Equipment / exposure info: Nikon d810a, static tripod, Nikkor 14-24mm. f2.8 ISO3200. 6-30 second images stitched with Microsoft ICE. July 7 2019 ~12:00 PST.

    Hunter

    ArchOverJoshuaTree.thumb.jpg.44fbda9c99c59e353649d6cb44262160.jpg

     

    • Like 34
  9. As one of my favorite parts of the sky, I decided to to a mosaic of the Veil nebula. I may add two more panels to include NGC 6995, however, I decided to process what I have at the moment.

    witch_Broom.thumb.png.f9568399350204d110ab4ab692800b09.png

    FSQ 106

    ASI1600mm

    Panel #1 and #2:

    ZWO Ha: 330s x 52

    ZWO OIII: 330 x 70

    This is a two panel mosaic (actually my second deep sky mosaic), stitched and processed in Microsoft ICE and Pixinsight.

    Visible in this image is the Witch's Broom Nebula, Pickering's Triangle, NGC 6979, and NGC 6974. I would like more annotations on the dimmer nebulae, but perhaps they do not have catalog numbers. Below is an annotated version:

    witch_BroomANNOT.thumb.jpg.a7dae811d404a041362c7b43efc139fd.jpg

    And a gray-scale image:

    NGC6960GRAY.thumb.jpg.23a56c61006f584209fcb0a22f40b5ca.jpg

    I was quite surprised by the amount of OIII signal in NGC 6960, but I've never imaged it with narrow band before🤔

    Thanks for looking and as always🙃 comments/ questions appreciated.

     

    • Like 22
  10. 1 hour ago, Rodd said:

    Nice looking shot.  For the blue halos--try making a loose fitting star mask then apply it to an inverted image--then use SCNR.....what ever the color will be.  When you invert the image the colors are opposite, so blue turns to red I think--whatever it is--SCNR will remove the halo only.  This work for me often--not always of course

    Rodd

    Thanks, I believe the halos are from my ZWO filters...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.