Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

geoflewis

Members
  • Posts

    3,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by geoflewis

  1. 7 minutes ago, Greymouser said:

    They are excellent! Makes me get an itchy trigger finger, regarding a dedicated camera, even though I only have a C9.25.

    3 minutes ago, neil phillips said:

    Lovely Geof the big C14 showings its resolution in bucket loads. 

    Thanks both, Mars is definitely begining to put on a show, hopefully with still better to come, though it doesn't get much bigger this apparition.

     

  2. I had fairly good seeing last night for long runs on both Jupiter and Mars. Unfortunately, whilst the seeing was good, transparancy was changeable, with lots of passing low haze/fog, requiring constant gain adjustments to balance the histogram. Everything, was pretty drenched by the end of the session. Nevertheless, it was an enjoyable session, with the below 3 images from the better of the Mars runs. Each is best 30% of a 6 min SER (75k frames) at 5ms (200fps), captured with the ASI462MC through the C14, with an ADC in train.

    2022-10-31-0007_4-GDL-RGB-Mars_lapl4_ap10_P30_sharp_R6_AFP.jpg.3535d47e96ff3730200ab3ceaf7bc474.jpg2022-10-31-0020_2-GDL-RGB-Mars_l4_ap9_sharp_R6_AFP.jpg.cb6b9b44602b5b3252c19765f4793450.jpg2022-10-31-0056_5-GDL-RGB-Mars_l4_ap9_sharp_R6_AFP.jpg.fe43416943adc0da723ac27e3d06c427.jpg

    Mars was at altidudes of 45° through 52° for these 3 captures. It is now displaying a 15" disc, with some good detail starting to come through. Olympus Mons is clearly seen, with the line of 3 shield volcanoes known as Tharsis Montes, just rotating towards the night time terminator.

    Thanks for looking.

     

    • Like 26
  3. 1 hour ago, neil phillips said:

    Btw registax designer is working on a new wavelets program. And is considering ideas to sharpen Mars while limiting edge rind. Right up our street sure you agree 

    That will be great to see. I didn't know the Registax designer was even still actively developing, as I hadn't seen any version changes in many years.....🤷‍♂️

  4. 11 hours ago, Pete Presland said:

    Given how the weather is in the UK, you certainly cannot afford to only image when the Jetstream is out of the way. I always feel a little more confident when it is not present, but as your image shows it is certainly possible to produce fine images with it over the country.

    Thanks Pete, yes, if it’s clear in the U.K. then it’s a go, Jetstream or not 

     

    • Like 1
  5. 1 minute ago, neil phillips said:

    It might be and seems to fit the description. But i also notice focus was good and stable. A lot of the time its been constantly coming and going. But not so on this night

    I don't know, I'm just speculating, but I wonder whether the focus shifting is due to vertical layers in the atmoshere mixing, causing an oscillating (up/down) lens effect, something that a steady fast flowing air stream might not do, or do much less, so consistent focus is more accessible.....🤷‍♂️🤔

  6. 9 minutes ago, neil phillips said:

    Ok its good discussion as i don't totally understand it myself. Here is a 1000 frame section at the start of the film up top. which was one of the calmer ones. Had to save as AVI because SER for some reason keeps converting to 50 FPS  and it affects the appearance. The capture has 200 frames per second and avi portrays that accurately. Will have to watch on reduced size window on your chosen avi player. or you won't be able to see correctly (it will be huge)  Just not full screen is what i mean. or the image will be resized to fit. 

    You can clearly see what looks like a fast jet stream running from left to right. No jet stream was on the map that night, and another member reported good seeing. There is good detail under the air stream as can be seen on the capture and finished image I've posted. My best guess is either a jet stream or heat from house rooftops but i am unsure. What's also interesting is although the problem is quite bad the result still looks quite good. Suggesting either the effect isn't as damaging as what it might appear. or my processing technique is helping cope with it. Or a little of both??. 

     

     

    00_06_05.ser_F00001-01000.zip 364.59 MB · 2 downloads 23_40_41.ser_F00001-01000.zip 416.84 MB · 0 downloads

    Thanks Neil, I have of course seen that effect, but never really paid much attention to the direction of the flow, so thanks for drawing my attention to it. I do wonder if that represents what I've referred to as 'laminar flow' in other discussions, i.e., smooth, not turbulent air flow, hence allowing detail to come through, despite the fast moving stream... 🤔🤷‍♂️

  7. 9 hours ago, neil phillips said:

    It's a odd night i can show examples if anyone's interested how bad an air flow going from left to right is on these images.

    Hi Neil, yes, please show what you're seeing plus how you identify/assess that effect, it will be very educational.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.