Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Allinthehead

Members
  • Posts

    3,059
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Allinthehead

  1. I captured these photons in September/October but I couldn't get an image I was happy with until I tried again a few days ago. Still feel it's a little murky looking and I had to be very heavy handed with the noise reduction. Having said that I think it was worth the effort in the end and it's not often seen in rgb.

    Shot through an Epsilon 130 with an Asi2600mc

    130*180 second subs rgb gain 100

    130*180 second subs Ha with the Stc Duo filter gain 100

    Processed in APP, PI and PS.

    Richard.

     

      23427587_Ngc_7822final.thumb.jpg.a30fe43b9856b9d85515d38512da73ae.jpg

    • Like 20
  2. 9 hours ago, Xiga said:

    Richard, I didn't know you used a pier. So do you leave your mount outside permanently? I see you don't have a Dome or RoR, so how do you protect the mount from the elements, in particular moisture? 

    Also, do you need to use any other form of dew control other than the dew shield?

    Yes the mount is outside all year round and is protected by one of these.

    https://www.firstlightoptics.com/telegizmos-telescope-covers/telegizmos-365-scope-cover-for-8-9-fork-mounted-scts.html

    It's a great cover but there can be a little moisture on the mount at times. No worse than what you might expect on a humid night.

    Dew shield works very well, no need for anything else.

    • Thanks 1
  3. On 08/05/2021 at 18:28, harrythewho said:

    Superb first images! Very comforting just to know it is possible that the scope arrives with good collimation. I have the QHY version of your camera, the QHY268.

    I ordered the 160ED a couple of days ago from Takahashi America. Was told ETA is September. Given the report above that ordering in December results in March delivery, I guess that's about right.

    Thanks, and good luck with your scope when it arrives.

  4. 3 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

    Similar thing happens when doing wide field shots. Here is example from Stellarium. When I put in Canon 750d (APS-C) and 85mm lens:

    image.png.c999292e17a67e62c5ba10548d1166d2.png

    image.png.fa578f83dad61d138c5e82753cdc35be.png

    I took group of stars - two of them in particular - when I align them to the left edge - line connecting them is angled one way with respect to vertical (top star is right of vertical and bottom is left). When I align same pair of stars to the right edge - angle changes - now top star is left and bottom is right. Whole frame "rotated". In fact - both frames are 0° - aligned with RA - but RA is not straight line it is circle on celestial sphere and as you track RA / circle - your frame rotates.

    This is with perfect polar align. This effect can also lead to panels being rotated one with respect to another - and they always are - it is the FOV that dictates if this will be seen or not (small FOV - very small angle of rotation).

    Nicely demonstrated, would I be correct in assuming that the effect is greater when imaging closer to the celestial poles?

  5. On 08/04/2021 at 19:39, vlaiv said:

    Indeed - it shows rotation well. Spikes change orientation.

    You could be right - I think that polar alignment can also cause this. Not sure which was dominant cause here.

     

    I'm assuming polar alignment is the dominant factor here as I had a fair amount of rotation between the three panels, I was forced to crop more than I would have liked as a result.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.