Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Stub Mandrel

Members
  • Posts

    10,662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Stub Mandrel

  1. 23 minutes ago, Dr_Ju_ju said:

    For your camera, all the info should be here https://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos_450d.html?type=drivers&language=&os=windows 10 (64-bit) 

    There's usually a button combination that has to be held when powering on that sets up the additional modes, i.e. updates

    I've visited that page many times.

    Alas no, the only root to a hard reset is leaving the battery out for a couple of weeks until the internal battery goes flat 😞

    Can anyone find a download of the Eos utilities for the 450 - connecting to a computer might be what it thinks its doing so trying it might work.

    Thing is Canon only make the updater available for download and I haven't got the CD 😞

     

    Quote

     

    Important Information

     

    Please be aware that this is an update version of this software and can only be used when you have a full version installed. 
    The full version can be installed from:

    - The original CD that came with your product, 
    - Downloading the 'Recommended for you' bundle or from the 'Full Version' tab if available.

     

     

  2. It may be the battery died at a bad time, but i've trire swapping teh SD card and using with and without it.

    Sometimes the blue light flashes when I put battery in (even though turned off), it then remains unresponsive.

    Sometimes a menu screen appears for a second, then it either goes blank screen or briefly shows the shooting info screen before going blank.

    Sometimes it goes straight to thr shooting info, then goes blank.

    Twice it stayed on the shooting screen for a few seconds and when blank when I touched the shutter button.

    The USB socket is clean, I removed the cooler and looked inside..

    I did remove and reattach the cooler yesterday so MAY have prodded something when filddling the remote jack back in. But if so, why would it work fine for an hour or two then throw a wobbly?

    And why does my guide camera go funny AND my desktop forget my work password leaving me without email, all on the same night?

    Perhaps their was a giant EMP or a massive solar flare....?

  3. I haven't used it with USB for over two years!

    But... I put a battery back in this morning and it dipalyed a menu. When I tried to get it into preview mode the blue 'pictbridge/computer connection' light started flashing feebly - I had to look at the manual to see what it was.

    Seems it thinks its connected to something 😞

  4. Woe is me!

    My AS1 120MC won't guide for more than a few minutes without locking up. I've reinstalled the driver (again...) and not even sure this has helped.

    Plus... my 450D (on remote timer) suddenly made a series of very quick exposures the showed the 'saving images when switched off screen'.

    Now it won't turn on, at all. I've tried three different batteries.

    This may be the end :-(

  5. This is a target I really thought I would never get from my garden.

    I have tried M16 before, which is a little higher, but it has always been totally wiped out by light pollution. Normally, even with a light pollution filter, I wouldn't even think of going back down into the murk...

    Last night there was both excellent seeing and transparency, so I decided to have a go, even without a filter as a 15 second test shot actually showed up the Swan.

    Being so low, just above the roofs and shed, not a lot of time, I managed to squeeze 50 2-minute subs in, more than I expected! This is the result, 150PL, 450D cooled and modded.

    Swan.thumb.png.f3a3bea545bf0677012aa2304bb97306.png

    • Like 8
  6. Found the double cluster, saw M31 and M31 clear as day but couldn't see M110. May just have seen the deer lick group. My alt is too slippy and my az is too  sticky, despite use of Mr Sheen. mY best bit of sky for observing was mostly the huge dso-free void south of Cygnus. No nebula filters...

    Went to bed at 2:15. Set the rig up to do the Little Dumbell and an alarm for 4:30.

    Got up at 4:30 skies seemed a bit pale. Computer had restarted (thanks microsoft) but I think my 'active hours end at 4' so hopefully not too much lost.

    Saw moon, so reconnected mount and put on lunar tracking and manually pointed the scope and got a truckload of subs of the new moon before it hit our chimney.

    • Like 1
  7. Tonight is amazing.

    Before it was fully dark I got some really good captures of Jupiter - it was barely moving even in 25ms exposures, the moons were pin sharp and the red spot was clear even being near the limb.

    I got out my 10" dob and I was able to go up to x320 on jupiter and Saturn. On Jupiter I could see polar bands as well as the two equatorial ones and even the spot before it disappeared into the limb. Only time I have seen all four moons on the same side of it.

    Saturn I could easily see the shadow on the ring, hints of banding on the planet and even flashes of the cassini division either side.

    I have never been able to image anything in Sagittarius because of skyglow and LP, but in teh end I got a load of subs of the Swan nebula  - it was even showing in a 15 second test sub.

    Doing the bubble now.

    Struggling to find things in the dob with poorly adapted eyes and just lack of skill, but i've seen Andromeda and M57 and looked right through the dumbell!

    I thought I would try one of these legendary 'star tests' to see how good my scope is. I pointed at Altair. Out of focus I could see the secondary supports etc. Focused in tight then backed off. I couldn't believe it, barely any movement and there were two perfect and complete circles around a central point.  It is clearly between 9 and 10 on the 'Pickering scale' http://www.damianpeach.com/pickering.htm.

    Then I checked my imaging rig - the HEQ5 is achieving 0.73" with the 150PL, a perfect match for the pixel scale.

    At last! A night when, finally, everything comes together! I just wish I could find some more DSOs!

     

    • Like 2
  8. Don't know if these two experiences are relevant:

    A few weeks ago I was doing Ha with my DSLR, before it got dark enough for DSOs I had a shot at a very low down moon. I got one of my crispest moon images despite the longer exposures. Was this because the narrowband helped overcome atmospheric dispersion, or because it was beating the seeing? But it reminds me that planetary/moon imaging shows just how much the sky wobbles on a short timescale - it amazes me how we can get any sharp images with long exposures!

    Tonight... it's really good seeing and really good transparency. That's so rare for me. This is actually the first time I have ever been able to collect data in Sagittarius. Despite beautiful star colours on 2-second exposure with my guide cam(!) when Ni pointed it at M24 I decided to go for M17 as it's probably my only chance ever. But i literally (as in literally, Olly!) only have less than two hours; in these circumstances I really don't think anything other than OSC is practical. I have even gone down to 2-minute exposures because experience tells me the skyglow will be too much for 5-minutes, and I haven't got a clip filter the only option for the 150PL. I've looked at two subs, and YES! I am getting swan-shaped ha so something good will happen.

    For such a 'smash and grab' opportunity only a DSLR will do.

    Plus I think I got my best Jupiter data for the year by a country mile, sadly saturn went behind the roof. Might have a go at it later but other targets are calling.

  9. 4 hours ago, John said:

    According to the "Clear Outside" site my sky is Bortle 5. I can see down to mag 5.5 stars around the zenith and a good chunk of the Milky Way

    Me too... I can see a short section of milky way at the zenith on about 2 days a year. Fortunately tonight seems to be shaping up to be one of those!

    • Like 1
  10. Just for a laugh, this data from the 20th is probably the worst I have ever got, through a 7nm Ha filter and a DSLR. Hazy cloud, moonglow and lumps of dust rolling around on the sensor as the scope was pointed almost vertically - but even these three things don'#t explain why it was just SO awful! Green is very low but there was a surprising amount of data on the blue channel. After stretching very crudely, it does show that there is overlap between all the pixels.

     

    blue.jpg

    green.jpg

    red.jpg

  11. Last night spoilt by thin and intermittent cloud, really. Stayed up to 2 but not sure how much usable data I got.

    Annoying as the HEQ5 was tracking at 1.05" which isn't bad with the 150PL hanging off it.

    Left it set up and parked, tried for mercury this morning while the sun itself was still behind the house. Couldn't see anything but there seemed to be a big white haze. Will try Venus late afternoon when the sun goes behind the tree, as it's 'trailing' the sun. Will then have a last shot at Jupiter and Saturn, before another wasted night failing to get DSO data 😞

  12. I think a good starting point is to work out what is limiting the quality of your images.

    For me I have a relatively small section of sky I can image with reasonably controlled LP, supposedly Bortle 5 but only on very clear nights - the thinnest of cloud picks up LP.

    Weather and reality mean I typically get a  couple of night's imaging a month, and 4-5 hours is a good session.

    My main cause of poor results  appears to be when I have thin cloud which results in poor signal to noise.

    My camera is a modded and cooled Canon 450D, and to be honest stretching my darks suggests background noise is so low they re only needed to remove hot pixels.

    My view is that without access to better skies and a bigger view, it isn't worth it because I will always be limited to the few targets that are directly over our house at the start of a session, so missing a filter due to a late start or poor weather could mean waiting at least a year for another try.

    I am really torn - I honestly don't know what would be the best solution for me.

    One thing I would like to do is see a fair comparison between cooled OSC camera and my cooled, modded DSLR. I suspect the cost of a cooled colour cam is not worth it. Mono may be, but only if I can get the data.

    I think @pete_l makes a fair point. I can sometimes get usable images for a few bright targets in one night, and then add more data from furher years.

    But it would be nice to do narrowband, although the cost of a cooled mono cam plus filters, even 1 1/4", is a bit scary.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.