Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Space Cowboy

Members
  • Posts

    7,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Space Cowboy

  1. 16 minutes ago, geoflewis said:

    No sharpening per se, just a different mix of wavelets. I almost never use any sharpening tools on my planetary images.

    Sorry Geof I was meaning wavelets in the sharpening sense. People talk about Registax, astrosurface or wavesharp but in my view there are so many different combinations of wavelet settings that similar results can be attained from either application.

    I really need to get some new data of my own rather than waffling 🥴

    • Like 1
  2. 45 minutes ago, Kon said:

    I would disagree+agree with Stuart @Space Cowboy as the softer ones feel like lacking something+something plesing too; the north pole is a lot softer but in the original image you have really nice details without being too much. The softer ones can be more pleasing to the eye. We have discussed this in length on how to have the smooth Damien like images that still have enough details.

    Its the fineness of detail I'm on about Kostas. Damien's images have such fine detail if we are making a comparison in that regard 🙂

    • Like 2
  3. 1 hour ago, geoflewis said:

    Thanks Stuart, oh so I thought you were asking for sharper detail. Here are my other 2 version.....

    WhatsAppImage2023-12-02at16_40_40_27e97437.jpg.c80e6675f0a4102c69335ec1526969c8.jpgWhatsAppImage2023-12-02at18_16.29_b9883a3e.jpg.bb128adcf32b947df9020eb5473140d6.jpg

    Hmmm.....I think its the type of sharpening. The detail in the softer version still looks coarser than  your previous November images.

     

    • Like 1
  4. 21 minutes ago, geoflewis said:

    Thanks Stuart, the images from 25 Nov and the better one from 11 Nov both had the GRS showing which is always pleasing, so makes them look good, but you may be right. Of course seeing is variable and possible the seeing on 1 Dec wasn't quite as good. I did produce a sharper version, which possibly shows more detail, but it just looked too harsh, but here it is fyi...

    WhatsAppImage2023-12-02at17_47.40_0ccae02e.jpg.784d313508adeafcf897f828ca5dc636.jpg

    I will be interest to have your opinion please.

    Yep that is a bit too much sharpening. The detail is becoming bloated especially on the north pole. If thats grade 3 and the first version is grade 2 I'd go for grade 1 🙂

    • Haha 1
  5. 16 hours ago, Kon said:

    Thanks Stuart. We seem to be finally getting some stable seeing. I hope you can be out soon 😉

    Can't face going out in the cold after working in it all day. Feel like I've been on an arctic expedition 😳 Same thing happened last December. 

    Did I ever mention last June? 😎

     

    • Haha 2
  6. Wow! Nigella these are the best Jupiter images I've seen on this forum in 2023! The natural detail is simply awesome! Its been mentioned about oversampling at f25 but its certainly not done you any harm.

    Couldn't resist another tweak on your colour balance (auto rgb balance in registax) and also enhanced colour vibrance in image analyser :

     

     

    23_50_49_20231127nb.pnganalyser.png

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.