Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

wxsatuser

Members
  • Posts

    4,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by wxsatuser

  1. On 10/08/2021 at 00:41, JamesF said:

    Do you have a reference for the details of the satellite at all?  I posted in another thread that it sounded unviable as something visible to the unaided eye, so it would be interesting to find out exactly what they (the company that appear to be providing the satellite) are planning.

    James

    You will not find anything about it apart from it was supposed to be funded with Dogecoin.

    Musk has talked up Dogecoin a few times so may be this tells some thing, calls himself the Dogefather.

    On Saturday Night Live Musk called it a hustle, and howled, “to the moon,” a catchphrase used
    by doge enthusiasts intent on getting the cryptocurrency to one dollar.

    Make of this what you will, this I found looking around financial sites btw.

  2. High flying birds like geese may reflect light and appear like a satellite.

    Not saying it was a bird but it may explain a wobbly path and slow or speed up.

    Never seen a satellite do anything unexpected and have seen the usual flares, blinking and going into eclipse.
    I have seen large birds at vary heights when imaging and surprising how many fly at night.

  3. I can assure you that us Brits know full well what VAT is and that it is in the price for consumers.

    If a business deals mainly with businesses then prices will not have VAT.
    If they deal with both businesses and consumers then the price will include VAT if not both prices should be displayed with equal prominence.

    At work we deal with mainly businesses, when we quote prices to a business it is assumed there is no VAT added although we always quote the price plus VAT.
    We do this because some unscrupulous firms try to catch you out by claiming the price you quoted is the lower price without VAT.

    The arguments I have had with some of these chancers, they are just trying it on or are ignorant of the law.

     

    • Like 2
  4. On 27/07/2021 at 16:55, alacant said:

    Perfect. So, like us you worked out for yourself what was best. You didn't get bogged down in theory.

    There will be the armchair theorists who will tell you it is totally insane not to include dark frames in your calibration; they can't cope with pragmatism.

    But wait. Can we generalise? No, of course we can't:

    • Your 60D: bias only works fine.
    • Our 700d: 1200d, 2000d and 4000d: bias only works best
    • Our 450d: the only way we can control the banding is to use dark frames
    • Someone else's dslr: until we've done your L+D etc, we don't know.
    • My mate's asi294 at -5º: darks are essential

    Hands on is perhaps the only way to go.

    Just our €0,02

    Cheers

    Modern cameras have on sensor dark current suppression.

    The 450D does'nt have it.

    • Like 1
  5. Cannot help with the filter but it may cause a reflection, may be some one else will comment on that.

    Re diffraction spikes.
    As you stop down they become more noticeable.
    An even number of of blades gives the same amount of spikes, 4 blades 4 spikes.
    An odd number of blades produces double the amount , 9 blades 18 spikes.

    You either love or hate spikes, me I don't care, it's something we have to expect if we use camera lenses.

    • Like 1
  6. Can I just add, although your sort of correct there are two autofocus systems in Canon cameras.

    The sensor autofocus only works in Liveview mode or in mirrorless cameras, I believe the whole sensor is used in dual pixel AF.
    In view finder mode there is a dedicated autofocus chip, I would assume that one wouldn't use Liveview in AP.

    • Like 1
  7. On 11/07/2021 at 16:24, Alien 13 said:

    At what altitude can you say you touched the edge of space? my best effort was on board a Korean airlines 747 flying over Russia at 52,000 feet due to the missile threat at the time, still got buzzed by a couple of Migs..

    Alan

    A 747's maximum ceiling is 45000feet and modern SAM missiles  go well above 52000feet anyway so it would'nt have mattered anyway.

    As to Mr Branson, when he does an orbit and reentry then that will be different and worth doing.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.