-
Posts
283 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Hals
-
-
-
-
Thought I'd try my luck with the Iris Nebula during the recent very nearly full Moon.
148 x 60s Luminance, 30 x 60s RGB.
Whilst it is nowhere near what you could obtain for the same integration time (just under 4 hrs) with no Moon I was pleasantly surprised.
Just to show that you can still obtain reasonable images when really you shouldn't.
Pete.
- 5
-
Thanks!
I routinely plate solve my images it's amazing all the "small" (I should say background) stuff that turns up.
- 1
-
-
-
-
JE1 The Headphones nebula. A 14th magnitude planetary nebula in Lynx.
Imaged for 19 hrs total integration time over several nights Dec '22 & Jan '23 and processed as HOO (14 hrs Ha & 5 hrs OIII - unluckily most of these sessions had a strong Moon hence the low OIII to Ha ratio).
Cropped image via 150PDS.
Pete.
- 8
-
Superb ethereal image. I do like that.
- 1
-
-
-
-
I'd add keep your current master dark flat too, if you use them.
Sorry didn't fully read the excellent advice from Catatonia properly !
-
Simply superb. The detail is excellent.
-
Cederblad 64: Also known as Lowers Nebula
The Lowers (father and son) were amateur astronomers and found this nebula on one of their photographic plates taken in 1939.
It is a relatively faint region emitting doubly ionized hydrogen. There is no accurate measurement as to the distance of this nebula, although best estimation is about 3300 light years.
Taken over three nights 11\13\19th January 2022, total time for the image is 7 hours.
74x300s Ha, 20x60s R,G,B.
Pete.
- 5
-
-
1 hour ago, AstroNebulee said:
Absolutely stunning image, I'm in awe.
Thankyou very much !
- 1
-
27 minutes ago, geeklee said:
Excellent Pete and very strong OIII. Was it an even split of filters over those 11 hours?
Thankyou.
It was just over 5 hours Ha and three each of OIII & SII.
Must admit the OIII did surprise me under the conditions. The SII was very subtle.
Thanks again!
- 1
-
-
Aesthetically the top one looks nicer to me, but...there's a hint of IFN in lower (more agressively processed?) image.
- 1
-
Superb. The HOO is my favourite.👌
- 1
-
-
23 minutes ago, scotty38 said:
Sorry I think you answered but I meant would you combine all night 1 separately to night 2 and then combine the 2 resulting images or would you mix both nights images and then process in one go.
The latter 👍
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, scotty38 said:
Nice image. How do you combine the different nights, all together at the start or do you process per night then combine. Which is the best way in fact?
Personally I combine them together after I've collected all the data, when I'm ready to process.
This way it doesn't matter when the data was taken, could be months or even years apart - as long as you have the original subs (and calibration frames) to re-stack with.
There are actually a few SII subs in here from February this year.
Others may do it a different way but this seems to work for me.
I use DSS & PS and so haven't dabbled into the dark art of PixInsight... yet!
Intergalactic Wanderer widefield
in Imaging - Deep Sky
Posted
Hiding among a rich starfield in Lynx is NGC 2418, a distant globular orbiting our milky way approx' 240,000 light years away. First thought to be not gravitational bound to our galaxy recent studies have shown it is...with an orbital period of around three billion years!
Widefield image and a crop.
LRGB image, a hair over 4hrs integration time against a 55% Moon. Clear skies are as rare as clear skies these days.
Pete.