Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

orionoffelt

Members
  • Posts

    297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by orionoffelt

  1. I managed to get a bit of imaging time on Tuesday night and went for this group of galaxies Holmberg 124 in Ursa Major I would have liked a bit more data but the clouds rolled in.

    Luminance of 33 x 300 and RGB of 5 x 300 each all binned 2 x 2 

    Celestron 11" scope with a F 6.3 reducer

    QHY9m camera

    Bob

    CV_Holm_124_RGB_registered+more sat+1.JPG

    • Like 14
  2. I was out imaging tonight and tried out the lens again I noticed before hand that the lens had a HOYA HMC UV  filter on the front of the lens which i removed and the frames from tonight were perfect so that has been my problem i bought the lens second hand and did not notice the UV filter. Thanks for the help .

    Bob

    • Like 1
  3. Hi Sean

    Thanks for the comments. I have had the QHY8 Pro since 2010 when I moved from a DSLR to a ccd I have found it a great camera I use it at -18 C and use the QHY driver at 1 - 140 hope that’s useful info.

    I used no filters and the adaptor is a one supplied by Modern astronomy which gives a good level fit between camera and lens.

    Hi Typo

    Thanks for the feed back. Your image shows a lot less aberrations with me just trying the lens out to get focus I had to turn the setting from infinity to further down F settings on the lens I wonder if another spacer ring were to be added it would then enable me to get closer to the infinity mark on the lens when achieving focus and this may give me less aberrations ?

    Bob

     

  4. Thanks for the reply I thought it looked like coma spherical abbreviation myself this was the full frame I did manage one more frame a 300 second one but half of it was through cloud and the bright stars looked the same. 

    I have a Canon DSLR I may try the lens on it and see what the stars look like as the ccd may have a different result but they are still OSC cameras. With the lens attached to the DSLR during the day the view looks perfect which I would have expected as day time imaging is more forgiving.

  5. I have been imaging for a few years now mainly with telelscopes But I bought a canon 200mm F 2.8 lens a while back and have managed to try it last night for a spell just before the clouds rolled in I coupled it up to my old OSC  a QHY8 Pro and find looking at this image of 2 x 60 frames that the brighter stars have flares has anyone come across this before and I wonder what is causing it and is there a solution ?

     

    Bob

    CV_Lens 2 x 1 min subs.JPG

  6. After some modifications to my set up I decided to test the gear out by imaging IC 2233 which is a edge on spiral galaxy one of the flattest known. So after a while I slewed to the star Castor to re focus  then slewed back while centering the target I noticed an artifact on the right of the image but checking up it was a small irregular dwarf Galaxy NGC 2537 ( Arp 6 )  so I set the frame up to include them both in the FOV this is a LRGB image.

    Imaged over two nights 06/08-01-2021

    Luminance of 7 x 600 un binned and 8 x 300 binned 2 x 2

    RGB of 8 x 300 each binned 2 x 2

    scope Celestron 11" at F 6.3

    camera QHY9m

    Bob

    CV_LRGB+6.JPG

    • Like 5
  7. This was imaged over two nights 21 / 22 - 11- 2020 I had problems with the guiding as it was windy at times but I have made it into a LRGB image of 31 x 300 of Luminance  and 5 x 300 each of RGB all binned 2 x 2

    Celestron 11 " scope with a F 6.3 reducer on and a QHY9m camera

    Bob

    CV_abell 262+5.JPG

    • Like 1
  8. Thanks Martin for the feed back It is a long time since I used this filter my thinking was that this target would end up over a street light so I give it a try but I agree it looks like a bad choice I will try to get some unfiltered data when I can if I remember correctly this filter worked well on nebula gassy objects you have to experiment at times.

    Bob 

  9. Imaged on 19-11-2020 I would of liked more data as the image is still a bit noisy but the way the weather has been I was lucky to get this.

    Luminance of 22 x 300 with a UHC-S filter

    RGB of 5 x 300 each

    all binned 2 x 2

    Celestron 11" scope at F 6.3

    QHY9m camera

    Bob

    CV_Hick 10 LRGB+6.JPG

    • Like 5
  10. I imaged this target over two nights 25-10-20 / 03-11-20 with RGB of 7 x 300 each binned 2 x 2

    and Ha of 9 x 600 + 9 x 900 binned 2 x 2

    I went for 10 minute subs of Ha first then 900 subs to see if the bit longer subs went deeper I thought they did so I think I will still go for longer subs where possible I combined both lots of Ha data.

    WO 90 scope

    QHY9m camera

    Bob

    CV_CV_HAR_RHAVB_AIP+F+scnr.JPG

    • Like 4
  11. I was pleased to get out imaging on Friday night the opportunities of late have been limited. This is a image of two Sharpless targets Sh2 152 / 153 imaged over two nights 08 / 23 10 -20 

    Ha of 9 x 900  and RGB of 8 x 300 each all binned 2 x 2

    WO 90 scope and QHY9m camera

    Bob 

    CV_Sh2 153 HaRGB+2.JPG

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.