Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

EQ mounts info please


Recommended Posts

I have just built my own 90mm f11 refractor which is currently sharing the mount with my motor driven Astromaster 130 (CG3 mount). I am finding that my prime focus astrophotograhy (with Canon 1000d) is limited to about 8 seconds before star trails are a problem. This is limiting me to m13,m57 and other low hanging celestial fruit. I am therefore looking for a better equitorial mount solution.

My impression is that I need to consider an EQ5, but is there a definitive explanation of what each type of mount is best for, e.g. whats the difference between EQ1, EQ2...EQ5, EQ6. (and where does CG3 fit into this?). This might be a useful primer for others too?

Finally, is building your on mount a viable proposition (I can only forsee lots of issues)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EQ mounts are built by the Chinese company Synta - marketed as Skywatcher here, and under the Orion label in the US. As the number rises, so does the size and load capability of the mount. EQ3-2 mounts and above can be equipped with GOTO.

The CG mounts supplied with Celestron mounts are very similar, although slightly higher quality I am told. A comparison would be

EQ1

EQ2 --- CG3 (I think!!)

EQ3-2 --- CG4 (Both copies of the Vixen SP mount)

EQ5 --- CG5 (Both copies of the Vixen GP mount)

HEQ5

EQ6

I think a EQ5, CG5 or Vixen GP mount would be a good starting point for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that helps clarify the "EQx" and "CGx" designations. Are there any standards/specifications that define the different mounts across manufacturers. We would all know what we are getting for out money then.

Incidentally, I got a second hand Symaster EQ3-2 (mechanically sound, but controller is shot - reflected in the price). I was impressed with the improvement over the CG3. Overall its a much better thought out design. Things don't collide in certain positions, it's more stable, easier to adjust and it's great having a hollow mount axis to align to Polaris.

I found the cheap (£28) motor from the CG3 worked on the EQ-2, albeit not as well as if the controller worked. Currently considering using generic stepper motor circuits driven from a PC. This has the potential to develop into a goto project.

cheers

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.