Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Apex-ED reducer


Recommended Posts

The x0.65 is quite aggressive, you might find you'll never get a flat field with it at the edges as I still struggle with the 183 sensor size but I normally crop, and with singular targets if you crop you won't even see the edges. The actual unit is nice and weighty. I still use it quite often though due to the speed at f3.8 and the 234mm FL it gives me with the z61. The normal flattener gives me f5.9 and 370mm FL, so it's quite versatile in offering you framing options.

I used it for this, you'll see the odd shaped stars in it:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Elp said:

The x0.65 is quite aggressive, you might find you'll never get a flat field with it at the edges as I still struggle with the 183 sensor size but I normally crop, and with singular targets if you crop you won't even see the edges. The actual unit is nice and weighty. I still use it quite often though due to the speed at f3.8 and the 234mm FL it gives me with the z61. The normal flattener gives me f5.9 and 370mm FL, so it's quite versatile in offering you framing options.

I used it for this, you'll see the odd shaped stars in it:

 

Probably not worth it then with a 4/3 or cropped sensor. If i'd have to crop too much you lose the benefit. I thought the flattening might be better than the stock. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/07/2023 at 13:26, Anthonyexmouth said:

Anyone here got any experience with one of these? Are they a worthwhile upgrade over a stock manufacturer reducer? 

 

The riccardi is not as harsh and a better balanced reducer. 

Adam

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Adam J said:

The riccardi is not as harsh and a better balanced reducer. 

Adam

Think I've got my backfocus as good as I can get and tilt is pretty good too but still a little distortion in subs but seems to clean up ok after stacking. Wondering If a better flattener is an option or maybe just throwing money at a problem that isn't really there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.