Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

08.11.2022, Jupiter at 17:45 and software considerations


Fedele

Recommended Posts

08.11.2022, 5:46 pm
C11A, PowerMate 2.5x, ASI224MC
Asistudio
I noticed that shortly after sunset, in the very early part of the evening, a very short window of excellent seeing is generally created (at least in my observing site) which leads me to see excellent details on Jupiter, even if relatively low.
And here it is Jupiter.
However, I wanted to submit to you two different processes:
First photo (gmr ON RIGHT), all in AstroSurface
For the second photo instead, I first used PIPP which led me to select and align in a video, the best 50% of the frames. Then I used Autostakkert for analysis and staking and AstroSurface for everything else. PIPP has reversed the puck compared to the first one. Amateur astronomers what do you think?
The process with PIP brings me to a vividness of Jupiter very similar to what I see in the great experts, while the process with AstroSurface tends to "sand" the result a little but is more homogeneous to me.
It also seems that using more software raises the risk of introducing artifacts, even if everything seems smoother

 

astrosurface.png

2022-11-08-1656_2-Jupiter_pipp_lapl6_ap1237.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.