Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Baader Hyperion Zoom IV back focus issue


Spile

Recommended Posts

If anyone is using the BHZ IV and Barlow with a Skywatcher 200P or similar Chinese brand, how are you mounting it or do you use a smaller 2" extender as well as the one that comes with the telescope?

Because I have to retract the EP about 5mm when I use it with the Barlow, I thought it would be a good idea to add a parfocal ring to the 2" adapter.

The problem now is that I don't have enough inward travel  to use the EP without the Barlow.

 

 

bhz parfocal ring.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/08/2021 at 17:23, Don Pensack said:

So use the eyepiece as a 1.25".  It's really a 1.25" eyepiece anyway.

I had hoped the same but the issue remains regardless which adapter is used. In fact the problem is exacerbated IIRC with the 1.25".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Spile said:

I had hoped the same but the issue remains regardless which adapter is used. In fact the problem is exacerbated IIRC with the 1.25".

Not necessarily.  2" to 1.25" adapters come in many different heights, from -12.7mm to +16.5mm

So you could change to a lower height adapter and get the 1.25" eyepiece just as close as the 2" eyepiece.

Ultimately, though, there is nothing prohibiting you from using the eyepiece as a 2" in the scope without the adapter at all, and using the 2" adapter when using the Barlow.

The focuser works without the 2" tall adapter.  You could even use the telescope as a 2" without any adapter and drop a normal 1.25" adapter into the focuser if you needed a lot of in-travel.

Edited by Don Pensack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Don Pensack said:

Not necessarily.  2" to 1.25" adapters come in many different heights, from -12.7mm to +16.5mm

So you could change to a lower height adapter and get the 1.25" eyepiece just as close as the 2" eyepiece.

Ultimately, though, there is nothing prohibiting you from using the eyepiece as a 2" in the scope without the adapter at all, and using the 2" adapter when using the Barlow.

The focuser works without the 2" tall adapter.  You could even use the telescope as a 2" without any adapter and drop a normal 1.25" adapter into the focuser if you needed a lot of in-travel.

I've tried all the combinations (1.25" / 2" / with/ without current adapter. That is why I wanted to find out what other users of the same combination were doing or had got to work before I got another adapter.

Confirmed by Baader...

"Skywatcher has a shorter 2" eyepiece holder available for this problem. But for now you might be able to remove the parfocal ring and live with the inconvenience until you can obtain the shorter adapter. "

 

Edited by Spile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shorter extender https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/astro-essentials-2-35mm-focus-extension-tube.html will mean that the focus tube is further out.

When using the Barlow, I would still need to use the longer adapter AND the short adapter above.

It might be easier (and cheaper) to carry on doing what I already do - Use the long adapter and draw out the EP 5mm when I use the Barlow.

 

Edited by Spile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One should remember that no matter how short the upper section of an extension tube is, it will still raise the eyepiece out of the focuser by at least the full length of the lower barrel of the eyepiece.

That will require a LOT of in travel at the focuser to get back to focus.  So if you need 1/2" of out travel to focus, it may not be the best solution.

It might be better, where focus travel is more limited, to utilize a barrel extender that threads onto the eyepiece but which still inserts fully into the focuser, and then

pull the eyepiece out to the focus point, knowing there is still enough in the focuser for safety.

 

I know this does not solve the problem of moving a filter from one eyepiece to another, but does get around the huge refocusing problem when an extension tube is used.

 

Creative solutions to the hassle of transferring filters from eyepiece to eyepiece (as a side note for the above):

--filter on the front of a coma corrector or Barlow.  This applies to newtonians or any scope with a Barlow.

--filter on the bottom of a 2" to 1.25" adapter.  This is a preferred method for planetary filters, where multiple high power eyepieces might be used.

--filter on the front of the star diagonal (refractor, SCT, MCT)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Don Pensack said:

It might be better, where focus travel is more limited, to utilize a barrel extender that threads onto the eyepiece but which still inserts fully into the focuser, and then

pull the eyepiece out to the focus point, knowing there is still enough in the focuser for safety.

Is that not what I am already doing  - see above post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spile said:

Is that not what I am already doing  - see above post?

No.  Your extension tube pulls the eyepiece out of the focuser a minimum of the length of the bottom barrel of the eyepiece.

If that works, then fine.  it might not work for other eyepieces, though.

Most of the time, you won't need that much pull-back distance, but only, say, 1/2", which is much shorter than the length of the lower barrel on the eyepiece.

In that case, adding a barrel extender (it merely extends the barrel of the eyepiece, but it is the same diameter as the barrel) works better, since you can simply pull the eyepiece out 1/2" and tighten it down

and know there is enough barrel down inside the focuser for safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided that the best option for me is also the simplest and cheapest - the 35mm focus extension tube. That works with the BHZ and my 42mm 65° EP. I will use it along with the the longer extension tube that came with the Skywatcher when I use the matching BHZ Barlow   

Other options were too expensive and offered no benefit and a narrower tube which could cause additional light fall off problems with my low power EP...

Standard M54 to M48 adaptor 5mm optical path + 15mm extension tube + 36.6mm ClickLock optical path = 56.6mm extension/optical path length.

10mm backfocus version of M54 to M48 adaptor + 15mm extension tube + 36.6mm ClickLock = 61.6mm optical path length/extension total
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.