Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Coma corrector and 1.25 eyepieces


Recommended Posts

Hi Folks, 

This may be a silly question, but I just purchased a Skywatcher coma corrector for my 130 pds and I'm trying to figure out how to use it with 1.25 eyepieces. 

So far, I've assembled it by using the adapter that came with the scope but this seems to create quite a long array of pieces, by the time I attach a barlow and an eyepiece it's going to be very long! 

I've attached a photo of what it looks like now. 

Hopefully you can shed some light. 

Thanks in advance for your wisdom 

Cheers 

Simon 

IMG_20200630_204535.jpg

IMG_20200630_204548.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hiya Simon. What is it exactly you are looking to be advised on as this is unclear. 

I know you say it is going to stick out some way but that isn't necessarily a problem.

Does it come to focus is the one question. 

Does it appear over heavy and flex the focuser at the ota fixing point.

It does state, "is optimised for the new Sky-Watcher Explorer DS f/5 telescopes with 2-inch focuser." In fairness it does state it as being suitable on the FLO website, probably on the advice of SW.

Also the 130 pds optimised as an imaging newtonian, it is unclear why are you using for visual. 

Sorry don't want to sound negative or anything but a bit more information might help people know where you are coming from and provide better informed answers to your queries.

Steve

Edited by bomberbaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bomberbaz said:

Hiya Simon. What is it exactly you are looking to be advised on as this is unclear. 

I know you say it is going to stick out some way but that isn't necessarily a problem.

Does it come to focus is the one question. 

Does it appear over heavy and flex the focuser at the ota fixing point.

It does state, "is optimised for the new Sky-Watcher Explorer DS f/5 telescopes with 2-inch focuser." In fairness it does state it as being suitable on the FLO website, probably on the advice of SW.

Also the 130 pds optimised as an imaging newtonian, it is unclear why are you using for visual. 

Sorry don't want to sound negative or anything but a bit more information might help people know where you are coming from and provide better informed answers to your queries.

Steve

Morning Steve, 

Thanks for your message. 

You are absolutely correct. I purchased the 130pds and the coma corrector for AP, and am really happy with it and the service provided by FLO. 

I did however, think that I may from time to time use the scope for visual as well, which I believe it is also capable of, if not its primary use. 

The combination of coma corrector, extension tube, barlow and eyepiece does, as you say seem to put some flex on the focuser. However!!! Thanks to the good folks at Flow, I have ordered an adaptor that not only shortens the set up but also allows me to use my dslr M42 T ring without buying a second M48 adapter. 

Thanks again for your help 

 

Clear skys 

Simon 

Screenshot_20200702-072204.png

Edited by Simon Dunsmore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.