Jump to content

NGC7000


upahill

Recommended Posts

Critique welcomed, first stack of this many 5 min exposures - close to 5 hours on this one, but need to be more selective with my subs I think.

Basic processing in PixInsight following some tutorials and stacked in DSS

Im getting quite a variance in 'score' when stacking. All subs taken the last few nights during practically full moon which hasn't helped. UHC-S filter on Canon 1200d Modded.

Auto-stretching gives two colours, a very red one and the one below which i prefer.

Autosave004.thumb.jpg.1d14ad3219bbf64f2d3bf8f93f87a04b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ollypenrice said:

Much better but still a bit thin on colour to my eye. I might also bring in the black point just a tad. It's good though.

Olly

Thanks Olly, I used the histogram to bring in the black a little which I think looks better as you say - was concerned about the colour alterations as I always find it looks a little too red after.

Autosave005-2.thumb.jpg.af952e537c9c886f7530dc1970bf3260.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, upahill said:

Thanks Olly, I used the histogram to bring in the black a little which I think looks better as you say - was concerned about the colour alterations as I always find it looks a little too red after.

Autosave005-2.thumb.jpg.af952e537c9c886f7530dc1970bf3260.jpg

As a predominantly Ha emission nebula it is red so I wouldn't worry about that. While I'd be tempted to try one or two further tweaks they'd be in Photoshop rather than PI which I don't know well. Its a fine result 'as is' though.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interested in this. I too recently imaged this with the same camera, but unmodded using CLS clip-in.
Could you tell me what ISO you used please? - I recently found a site that said that (for astro photography) the best ISO was 800 - but could push to 1600 I guess.

Thanks in advance. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used 1600. With dithering the noise was mostly erradicated during stacking anyway, along with the banding which was quite bad in this camera. I had read that the difference in noise between 1600 and 800 was negligible so opted for the higher sensitivity. I have a Baader UHC-S filter in the t-ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.