gonzostar Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Hello Tjis image of m63 (certainly seen better on this site) was taken over a couple of nights. 60 mins worth of 2 minute lights unguided using a 8"SCT with focal reducer, With a canon 450d DSLR camera . Then stacked using DSS then further processed using gimp Any suggestions for big improvement would be appreciated. Especially how to make it look smoother Thanks for looking Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Another Messier checked. Nice. The quality of the image suggests that despite the large number of 2 minute subs, you are dealing with underexposure. The banding you have also indicates this. Maybe time to try autoguiding again to get longer subs. Good luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzostar Posted May 4, 2016 Author Share Posted May 4, 2016 Yep another one checked. Of course you are right about taking the autoguider plunge. At the moment saving for guide camera and laptop. There is nothing more frustrating the spending an hour on a object then few subs are stacked! Not sure what is ment by banding? Cheers Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 By banding I mean the horizontal dark stripes in your image. BTW, now that galaxy season is nearing it's end and the Milky way is coming into view, you might consider doing wide field. You will find it much easier to take long unguided subs, and many interesting targets only require a longer focal length lens (from 100+ mm). I've seen really good images of Andromeda taken with a 200 mm lens. Just a thought... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzostar Posted May 5, 2016 Author Share Posted May 5, 2016 Yes Seem to have better successes when there is a more rich star fields compared to galaxy season. Saying that though there seems to be plenty of stars on camera frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Not just the number of stars to help stacking. When you do wide field you have a shorter focal length, and polar alignment is less critical. This will allow you to take longer exposures per light frame. You can then also image at a lower ISO setting, which will give you light frames with less noise. Brighter images with less noise are much easier to process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzostar Posted May 5, 2016 Author Share Posted May 5, 2016 I have decided my scope doesnt like galaxies! I had a go at M57, and despite it being low down here DSS managed to count 150+ stars. I will seee how that processes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 Good luck with that. My imaging this season is over. "Up here" the skies are just to bright for AP until mid/end of August. Only Jupiter is bright enough at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzostar Posted May 6, 2016 Author Share Posted May 6, 2016 Thats a good excuse to have a observatory in the mediterrianian! Just stacked a few lights of m104 from yesterday. Looks like my issue could be focus, as only 1 stacked from the other day and 7/9 today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 8 hours ago, gonzostar said: Thats a good excuse to have a observatory in the mediterrianian! Just stacked a few lights of m104 from yesterday. Looks like my issue could be focus, as only 1 stacked from the other day and 7/9 today! I only wish ... I will save for a better mount in stead. As for focus: don't rely on your eyesight, even if it is good. A Bahtinov is a cheap investment with huge return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.