Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Jupiter Feb 23rd


spider72

Recommended Posts

Thanks James.

I have used 2x barlow and than I have placed diagonal between barlow and camera to extend light path and get even higher magnification. Judging from images size between these taken with and without diagonal I think I have achived about 1.5 additional magnification factor thus approx value of f/35.

Here is a version without diagonal f/24

video10rgbcomposergbcor.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Maciek,

Very nice for a Mak127. Most barlows achieve a slightly higher magnification than the quoted with a camera attached as the camera sits further out than an eyepiece. E.g. My 2x gives nearer 2.3, my 3x gives nearer 3.5 with an DFK/DMK.

I check it by taking one shot at prime focus and then compare the one with the Barlow, counting the pixels across the disc, or using a ruler in the software.

Robin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks James.

I have used 2x barlow and than I have placed diagonal between barlow and camera to extend light path and get even higher magnification. Judging from images size between these taken with and without diagonal I think I have achived about 1.5 additional magnification factor thus approx value of f/35.

Yes, that's pretty consistent with my own experience. I use a Revelation 2.5x barlow with a 40mm extension in the back and I think I'm getting roughly the same focal length. The diagonal probably adds nearer 60mm after your barlow.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Robin

Thanks, glad you like it and I am surprised myself with the final result. Maybe even more as seeing was quite poor yesterday and it was windy and most of my clips were really shaky.

And yes I know that with most cameras image amplification with barlows is slightly larger due to resons which you have mentioned.

I am alredy thinking to use additional extender between barlow and camera to get even better close up but I will be way over my scope optical resolution I think, but I will try anyway if seeing will be good enough for larger image amplification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.