Jump to content

Guiding cam that can double for planetary cam


kirkster501

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I was looking at getting a Altiar Astro 60mm finder/guider and also getting a QHY5 for guiding.

I use a SPC900 for planetary stuff at the moment (and I have not outgrown it yet either - still a beginner). I would like to get a guiding cam for my ED80 setup for DSO. But it occurred to me, could a Guidecam double up as a planetary camera as well? No need for guiding on planetary (which I do with my CPC1100) at all so a colour QHY5v could be an option?

Thanks, Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also for guiding (or lunar/solar imaging) color cameras are less efficient.

Really? Wow, thanks. So you think best stick to the QHY5 then for guiding and keep it for that purpose and worry about a planetary cam when i am ready?

Thanks, Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use the DMK21AU618 and also benefit from a very good Luna Planetary cam, its worth looking also at a QHY IMGOH as it come with ST4 where as the DMK does not, not the cheapest of options, but tick all boxes well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

I am a relative newbie at this, but I have been using an IMG0H colour version for exactly what you were proposing to do.

My comment would be this; the camera works well as a planetary and guide cam, with the added benefit that it has (unregulated) TEC cooling, so I've managed to use it for the smaller DSOs.

There are two downsides though:

1. The drivers are primitive to say the least. I've used it with QHY EZPlanetary and FireCapture, and in Maxim using a basic ASCOM driver. They definitely need more work.

2. The 618 chip is minuscule - something I didn't fully appreciate till I used it in practice. I spend a lot of time making sure the target is centered correctly (I'm using a C9.25 on a CG5), and that tracking is spot on - otherwise Jupiter has a tendency to drift off screen. I suspect this would be a worse problem with a CPC1100, with a pixel/arcsecond value of 0.419 and effective FOV of 0.094 degrees. I assume the DMK21AU618 would have the same problem since these are chip characteristics.

In summary, I would suggest the IMG0H is a 'jack of all trades' which is great if you want to use it as a number of things (planetary/guide/small DSO), but is not the biggest chip you can get (FOV problems). Mono version might be better for your particular use.

Good luck on your choices!

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.