Ganymede12 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 What does anyone know of the EXPLORER-130 ? I was thinking of upgrading to it from my Sky-Watcher SK707A72 but I want to check that it's worth it.Current Telescope Sky-Watcher SK707AZ2 Refractor, altazimuth mount, 70mm diameter objective lens, 700mm focal length, 25mm eyepiece, 10mm eyepiece, X2 Barlow lens,6X24 straight through finder scope.Possible UpgradeEXPLORER-130, equatorial mount, 130mm diameter primary mirror, 900mm focal length, 25mm eyepiece, 10mm eyepiece, X2 Barlow lens, Red dot sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabberwocky Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I have the 130m and it's a perfectly good scope, but the mount lets it down, personally if I were you I'd get the skyliner 150 dob, give or take the same money but bigger aperture, better focuser and a sturdier more user friendly mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat502 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I have just purchased what you see in my signature block. I went for the 'P' Parabolic. Apparently better. Anyway I am well impressed with it. Got it from Rother Valley Optics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheridangj Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I have just upgraded from the Explorer 130P after about 6 months use to the Skyliner 200P Dob. Image-wise I thought it was excellent and the red-dot finder is a doddle to use - I could locate DSOs in fairly remote parts of the sky pretty quickly just by judjing what region of the sky to point it at and using the supplied 25mm EP to find them. As someone else mentions though, the EQ2 mount isn't quite sturdy enough and you spend a lot of time waiting for vibrations to dampen down. The focusser is basic but does the job. The 150P dob isn't much more expensive than the 130P and as has already been said - gives more aperture and a better focusser. Dobs are bulkier but they are very quick and easy to set up. Hope that helps.Gav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganymede12 Posted April 3, 2012 Author Share Posted April 3, 2012 I've looked at the skyliner 150 dob and it seems a bit... big. I was thinking of getting a Newtonian because, like my current scope, I could take it down, carry it in a large bag and re-assemble it at my chosen location. The size of a dobsonian would make it awkward to store. I'm not old enough to have a place of my own so I have to be able to store it in my bedroom! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheridangj Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 I would definitely recommend one of the 130mm Skywatchers then - I could easily carry mine over to my local park which was a couple of mins walk. Haven't tried it with a motor but that might partially solve the vibration issue as you wouldn't have to keep touching it when tracking. Dobs are as you say, big, and although not terribly heavy for the smaller ones they are cumbersome, especially if you can't store them outside or in a garage etc. There is a 130mm dob - called the 'Heritage' which is very compact and costs about £140. Never tried it but I think it's meant to be ok. You'd need a sturdy table to put it on though. I was thinking of checking it out as a holiday scope as it would take up very little room when travelling.CheersGav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat502 Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Yes I had a dobs 8" and I never took it out the garage as it was too bulky. Fortunately it was given to me. I think it would have been ok if I could have fitted wheels on it though. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.