Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Melancholia


West End Wendy

Recommended Posts

Saw the film Melancholia last night. It's an interesting film - a piece of art house cinema with a disaster movie plot.

Anyway, the basic premise is that a planet hiding behind the sun breaks out of its orbit and starts on a collision course with Earth.

There was, of course, a time when scientists believed there was a planet hiding behind the sun, and only Einstein and gravitational lensing ended that theory of explaining Mercury's non-Newtonian orbit. So of that bit is possible, could, in theory, the rest also be also? What force could move such a planet out of its existing orbit? A collision with another body perhaps...

Ok, the film is an allegory not a piece of science, but it's always interesting to think about such things.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite the same storyline, but didn't one of the early Doctor Who serials - The Tenth Planet - feature a planet that had formerly shared an orbit with Earth before 'escaping' and then returning: complete with Cybermen for their first 'visit' to our screens :)?

Also that was the last appearance of William Hartnell as the first Doctor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melancholia is an interesting film but the science in it can't be taken seriously (and there isn't much). Main astro interest is the Meade telescope that Kiefer Sutherland uses.

Also check out Another Earth which has a similar premise and has a little bit more of a sci-fi element to it (though again it's not really sf). The telescope in that one is Bresser I think. There's an amusing bit when they're looking at the new planet with the telescope indoors aiming through a window - and the lens cap is still on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly watched this the other night but didn't in the end, it looks dire but I guess it's a Von Trier thing. It looks like he has managed to take a story with promise and make it as dull as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melancholia is an interesting film but the science in it can't be taken seriously (and there isn't much). Main astro interest is the Meade telescope that Kiefer Sutherland uses.

Yes - I have to admit I was rather interested in that too (was it a 127? I want one).

Thanks for the other film reccomendation, I'll check it out.

I guess it's a Von Trier thing

Von Trier is guaranteed to polarise opinion. I thought Melancholia worked really well, but I do find some of his stuff almost unwatchable.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite the same storyline, but didn't one of the early Doctor Who serials - The Tenth Planet - feature a planet that had formerly shared an orbit with Earth before 'escaping' and then returning: complete with Cybermen for their first 'visit' to our screens :)?

Also that was the last appearance of William Hartnell as the first Doctor.

Yes that does ring some bells, although I only really go back to Tom Baker with Dr. Who.

I do love a good ridiculous Sci Fi plot though. The Daleks killing everyone on the Marie Celeste is my favourite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Von Trier is guaranteed to polarise opinion. I thought Melancholia worked really well, but I do find some of his stuff almost unwatchable.

I saw Antichrist the other night and parts of it are definitely in the "almost unwatchable" category. But I reckon Dogville is a masterpiece.

Melancholia left me feeling physically unwell by the end - but I was glad I saw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I saw Antichrist the other night and parts of it are definitely in the "almost unwatchable" category. But I reckon Dogville is a masterpiece.

Melancholia left me feeling physically unwell by the end - but I was glad I saw it.

I'm looking forward to it. My wife and I have a list of ''challenging' but worthwhile' films and Antichrist joined Dead Ringers and Ichi the Killer when we saw it last year. We're also watching Kingdom at the moment - very subtle, funny and human. Love it.

I really enjoy how science fiction sometime has the capacity to shape the future it sets out to describe: Asimov's three laws' application in modern robotics; Gibson's 'cyberspace' and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.