Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

bish789

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bish789

  1. 8 hours ago, Kimboman said:

    Hi thanks it was not a zero cost it cost me £4.80 for the tee hinges and the timber for the back leg everything else from stock in my workshop

    £4.80? Exorbitant. Couldn't justify that sort of expenditure. I will wait until I have enough amazon cardboard boxes to pile up and make a suitable seating arrangement

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
  2. 11 minutes ago, Tiny Clanger said:

    Bit dusty, you can see why they want to sell it, not used in a while  🙂 

    The key points to if it's worth it are the state of the glass, and the functioning of the mount.  If like on my 102, the dew shield is fixed on the 127, it would be quite difficult to get an accidental fingerprint on the front of the objective, but there might have been deliberate cleaning  attempts . I'd ask if it's been stored with the lens cover in place , because it is recessed into the dew shield rather than overlapping it, it's hard to tell from side on pic.s

    You might ask for a head-on pic of the lens to check the state of it  , but it might not be a very good photo you get back because of the dew shield shadow.

    When he brings it I'll be checking it over well, any problems, no buy

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.