Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Pete_B

New Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pete_B

  1. Actually, the venerable brontosaurus was reinstated as a real dinosaur a few years back, so there is still hope for Pluto. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brontosaurus-is-back1/
  2. Thank you Vlaiv, for your amazingly clear answer with the 3 Points (a post which I have now re-read several times) ! I have a question - as per your quoted text above, if we just say that we should go with 1.2"/px as the 'best' we can reasonably expect to image (with typical seeing conditions etc) then does this basically mean that (as amateurs) we can really NEVER obtain an image of that example galaxy which is greater than 750px, regardless of telescope focal length, camera etc etc? If so, that is rather depressing... (And relatedly: When we take many dithered images and stack them, doesn't that allow clever processing to 'generate' additional image resolution?)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.