Jump to content

Bongo

Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bongo

  1. Thanks for the tip - I've never used a solar filter before so I have nothing to compare it to!
  2. Thanks. That's more or less what I'd assumed. I'm pretty sure it's not a 'special' eyepiece in any way - just the bog standard sort of eyepiece you get with a new 'scope. Cheers.
  3. Hi! I recently got my hands on a new telescope (Bresser MC-127), and it came with a solar filter. I hadn't really planned on doing any solar observing, but I figured I'd give it a go. I got a good view of the sun (an achievement in itself in the UK!) and a few sunspots. They've caught my interest and I'd like a 'closer' look. Now, here's my question... at the moment, the Sun juuuust fits within my field of view when using the eyepiece that came with the telescope. The instructions say to only use the eyepiece that came with the telescope. However, I have a few BST eyepieces that would give a higher magnification - is there a good reason I shouldn't use them (e.g. are only certain types of eyepiece suitable for solar? Might I damage the eyepiece, or toast my retina?). Or are Bresser just covering themselves in case I do something dumb with some whacky combo of optics? Any thoughts appreciated. Thanks.
  4. Plenty of things for me to try there. Thanks everyone!
  5. Aaaaah! That's interesting. I'll take a look. Thanks.
  6. Hi! Thanks for your reply. Yeah, it really is an aging DSLR - a Nikon D40 - and as far as I know it doesn't have live view. It was languishing unused in a drawer si I thought I'd try to put it to some use. 🙂
  7. Hi, I have a modest telescope (see footer) and have recently had a go at some photography. Using an aging DSLR and a 2x Barlow I was able to get some OK-for-a-beginner's-first-attempt pics of Jupiter, and some nice moon pics (see attached). I don't expect amazing photography with my set up, my goal is to be able to show family and friends what I'd seen through the 'scope with my own eyes. One of the problems I have is focussing - through the viewer of the DSLR, Jupiter is a tiny, bright speck and its hard to tell whether its in focus or not. I tend to guess, take a photo, view it on the cameras screen, zoom in, adjust focus and repeat until its 'near enough'. Is there a way of doing this more precisely and/or quicker? Also, if I was to invest in a 'proper' camera e.g. one of the cheaper ZWOs, would I be able to preview images live on my laptop? I guess it would be easier to see if I was in focus on a bigger screen. Any and all tips welcome! Thanks in advance.
  8. Hah! Yeah, I thought exactly the same. Pretty cool to see for the first time but I can imagine it could get annoying pretty fast!
  9. Hi all, Hoping someone here can help me identify what my son and I saw on Saturday night, here in Driffield, East Yorkshire, UK. It was about 7.30pm and we saw what looked like a satellite travel roughly west to east (constant bright light, steady path, no noise). It was followed by another, and another, with maybe 5-7 visible across the sky at any one time, all travelling in the same path, more or less evenly spaced. We certainly counted 15 of them, but there were definitely more (we only thought to start counting after a while!). Now, from descriptions I've heard/read, I assumed it was Starlink, but the app I use (StarWalk 2) seemed to suggest that Starlink wouldn't be visible. So, I guess, either the app is duff, or I'm misunderstanding what it's telling me, or I saw something else (what?). I appreciate I'm being a bit vague, but can anyone shed any light on what we saw? Thanks! Rob (and a curious 9 year old!)
  10. Thanks. Sorry for the delay in responding. My eyepieces are as listed in my footer - I do have a 5mm BST and a 2x Barlow. Looking at everyones comments, I think the main issue might be my location. In my garden, although it's pretty dark, I have low buildings all around so I'm always looking over *someone's* roof. I think a trip into the local countryside with the scope may be an idea. I'm fairly confident with the collimation.
  11. That's an interesting suggestion - I might give that a try.
  12. Thanks for the advice. Yeah, I've checked the collimation.
  13. Thanks for your reply. Maybe I'll have to save up for a little longer then. Imaging might keep me busy in the meantime though - good suggestion.
  14. Hi, I bought my first 'scope (a Meade Lightbridge 130mm reflector*) a couple of years ago. I didn't really know what I wanted to look at in particular when I bought it, and it looked like a good general purpose starter scope. As such, I've been pretty happy with it. As I've been using it, I've become more interested in planetary observation than anything else. With my current setup I've been able to just about make out the rings of Saturn. I can see Jupiter and the Galilean moons and, on a good night with a little imagination I can make some banding out - the red spot has so far eluded me! Mars is a twinkly red dot. So, I'm thinking of buying a new telescope with the hope of seeing more planetary 'stuff'. What sort of specs/scope should I be looking at to see a noticeable improvement on what I have? I guess a budget would be up to around 500 GBP. Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks! * This one, to be precise https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/reviews/telescopes/mead-lightbridge-mini-130-dobsonian/
  15. Some good pics there! Welcome aboard.
  16. I think the received wisdom about dobsonians is that most of your hard earned cash money goes on the 'scope rather than the tripod/mount. Depending on what you go for, you *may* be able to mount it on a tripod at a later date if you feel the need. My 130mm Meade can be stored pointing upwards and takes up about the same amount of space as a waist-high pedal bin, so it's not too hard to store. If you're really concerned about space then maybe look at a flex tube option. I can't advise you on these really - no experience of them. But there are some options here: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians.html
  17. Hi, I think you can certainly expect that for <£1k! I have one of these: https://scopethegalaxy.com/meade-lightbridge-mini-130-review/ ...and it cost me approx £250, about 18 months ago. That exact model isn't available any more (not new anyway), but there are plenty of others with similar specs. On a good night (and a clear sky/good seeing is *everything*) I have been able to make out the rings of Saturn and juuuust about make out bands on Jupiter (and also the Galilean moons). I think, in retrospect, I'd have gone with a SkyWatcher, such as: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians/skywatcher-skyliner-200p-dobsonian.html ...and I still might. But to answer your question, yes, you can definitely get a decent scope for <£1k powerful enough for you to see what you're after.
  18. Decent effort with a phone!
  19. Hi. I don't know of any specific spots, I'm afraid, but it might be worth checking out the North York moors? Not *too* far from your location, hopefully... https://www.northyorkmoors.org.uk/visiting/whats-on/dark-skies-festival https://www.darkskiesnationalparks.org.uk/north-york-moors-events You'd hope there'd be at least one suitable location in the whole of the moors. 🙂
  20. It might just be bad seeing - non-ideal atmospherics etc? The first night I observed Jupiter I had similar problems. Turned out to be very slightly dodgy collimation and just poor seeing. A tweak to the collimation and a better night made all the difference. That’s just my personal experience, I’m no expert and others on here my have other/better suggestions! good luck!
  21. I can't believe I missed that bit! How embarrassing! 🙂 Thanks @Stu and @Cosmic Geoff for your input.
  22. Hi, I'm pretty much a newbie, so apologies if this is stupidly obvious! I have a 130mm Dobsonian reflector* - it's not particularly heavy (3.7kg). I was wondering whether its possible to mount it on a tripod? My main reason is that I don't have anything particularly steady enough to stand it on. Plus if I could get it another couple of feet higher then I'd be able to see things currently obscured by my neighbour's fence! Assuming it's possible, what should I be looking for/ avoiding? Any advice and tips would be much appreciated! Thanks * this exact one: https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/meade-dobson-telescope-n-130-650-lightbridge-mini-130-dob/p,54287#tab_bar_1_select
  23. I'd second that. I'm in a similar position, maybe a step ahead of you in that I've just upgraded from the eyepieces that came with my 'scope.. The BST Starguiders (I got a 5mm, an 8mm and plan to get a 25mm when funds allow) made a very noticeable improvement and were well worth the price. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces.html Good luck!
  24. Just as a footnote to my original post... I collimated my telescope at the weekend (for the first time!) and that seems to have been the key. For anyone who's nervous about collimating (as I was), it was dead easy and took about 15mins max. The result has been that I saw the bands of clouds on Jupiter for the first time, which was pretty amazing. OK, it took some concentrating and waiting while seeing improved, but I got there in the end. Very pleased indeed. Thanks to all on here for the hints and tips.
  25. Hello fellow East Yorkshire person! I'd definitely agree with @Tiny Clanger about the moon filter. My scope is only 130mm aperture and its pretty blinding when viewing a bright full moon. Personally, I don't notice more or less detail, but I am able to spend more time before my retina begs for mercy. I got one of these: https://www.astroshop.eu/moon-filters-polarizing-filters/omegon-filters-moon-filter-1-25-/p,5085 I've nothing to compare it to, so I can't tell you whether or not its a 'good' one, compared to others on the market.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.