Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Dan13

Members
  • Posts

    367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dan13

  1. 5 minutes ago, ScouseSpaceCadet said:

    The AZGTI isn't a one trick pony like the Star Adventurer. It's a bona fide GoTo mount while being very small, light weight and versatile.

     

     

    There's loads more videos and a search on the forums will reveal plenty of info.

     

    Thank you, Funny enough i was just about to watch Cuiv's video, yes i have had a little browse through the forum, kind of wanted some first hand experience with folks using the same scope, thanks for the info ill keep digging and watching

    • Like 1
  2. Hi, Ive recently sold up most of my astrophotography gear as it just wasn't being used, last year for me was terrible weather wise and decided to sell up while the prices were good with a view to take it back up again when i retire.

    That being said i kept my 127 mak as still want to view but id also like to still do planetary imaging, What type of mount will be sufficient without breaking the bank? is a Star adventurer enough payload wise to image with the mak?

    I think it will be the mak, a red dot and an asi 224 or 290 ill be using, i know im a bit foolish as i sold my HEQ5 pro but the current price for 2nd hand atm it was hard not to and also the added fact i would like to be more mobile and go out with my rig more leaned me towards something lighter.

    Anyone image the planets with a 127 mak and Star adventure? or the ioptron equivalent?

    thanks for any help

  3. 36 minutes ago, Seelive said:

    Many years ago I disposed of all my equipment including the observatory, mainly as a result of it not being used due to family and work and commitments. A few years ago with such considerations no longer applicable I was able to resurect my interest in AP but I had to start all over again and, as the site of the old observatory is now a raised flower bed, the new kit had to be portable.  So yes, I do regret getting rid of it but having said that, I probably would have updated it anyway as it mid 80's vintage.

    Thank you and this is what im thinking. Im roughly 30 years from retirement atm maybe a little less, my kit will be far obsolete by then, we could even be living on mars haha, if i sell now and get some good money for it all im sure for my retirement present i could treat myself to some new kit! its just between now and then im worried about and how much ill miss it, lately its been not at all but they always say you dont know what you got till its gone....

  4. 57 minutes ago, kirkster501 said:

    I think the issue is that due to lack of use in the UK, it can start to cause stress and anxiety, the sheer value of this very expensive gear lying around doing nothing, especially if you havd to justify it to a SO, a problem that I do not have as yet.

    Then, a clear night comes along and you waste it sorting out equipment gremlins.....

    Ah yes them pesky gremilins! haha thats the worse bit, im gagging to get out there to see how i feel about it but the task of it all after being away for so long seems daunting....

  5. Just now, teoria_del_big_bang said:

    I know what you mean and I guess the aim eventually is improvement on your images to the last time you imaged that target, or one thing I want to progress to is mosaics, which really do need patience on some targets to get the amount of data required and can take years if the target is only available for short periods each year.

    But I also think that the biggest improvement I can maybe make is, as you say, dark skies.
    And maybe I would get better images with a smaller more portable setup but travel a bit more.
    My area has some pretty dark skies if I am prepared to travel, I still have same issue with weather but at least the few clear nights I get, if I am fully retired, could be used much better if I can easily put my gear in the car and off I go at the drop of a hat. Advantage for me is that I would not have to get up for work so could sleep later.
    And, apart from keeping something like a HEQ5 mount and smaller scope all the heavier and more expensive items could go and still get some good data.

    Steve

    Agreed Steve,

    My set up is pretty portable to fair and this is my stumbling block, the two most expensive things in my rig are my cooled asi 294 mc pro and my Hyperturned HEQ5 pro. My scope is of money dont get me wrong but i feel if i downsized then id be jeopardising my image quality. Ive had a full spec DSLR before and the difference between that and my cooled cam imo is night and day, do i want to go back to that again...probably not, so thinking more about it, its either sell or all nothing at all. I have a 127 mak for viewing with some nice lenses, i can easily get an eq3 cheap to view with and thats the viewing sorted.

    in my personal opinion i wouldn't want to image with anything less then my HEQ5.

    • Like 1
  6. 20 minutes ago, callisto said:

    Your not alone, that's for sure....I've had most of my AP gear since July last year and its been out twice!

    I've been seriously thinking of letting all my AP gear go and just keep my 10" dob for visual and spend the money I make on decent eyepieces :icon_scratch:

    I must admit, I'm a bit of a impulse buyer and afterwards think do I even need this stuff.

    Mark

    Im with you on the impulse buyer! im very impulsive with all my things, During lockdown my love for film come back so now i have over 100 4k movies, i missed playing the guitar so now i have another guitar lol, actually reading this back maybe i have an underlying issue i need to clear up haha! but yes i just know ill regret it but somethings telling me to sell up...

    • Like 1
  7. 2 minutes ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

    A difficult one.
    I love the hobby and things worked out just about right for me in that I had built up to a reasonable imaging setup just before retirement last April, so bought when I was earning the money (Still working part time but due for full retirement soon).
    But had very few totally clear night sessions last year due to weather, and as mentioned above, all has been NB because ALL (really ALL) the clear nights had near to full moon.

    If I was rich then without doubt I would keep the gear (and get better gear) whether I used it regularly or not, but I often think is it worth having £5K+ worth of gear for the handful of sessions I get each year.

    At the moment I keep onto the idea in retirement I will get my obsy which helps tremendously with being able to either squeeze an hour here and there if skies clear rather than dragging all my gear out of the garage just for the clouds to roll in again.
    Only issue I have there is that we also plan to downsize house so also been holding off till we move and of course house hinting not easy because I want somewhere with pretty dark skies and the least LP.

    So all in all its a hobby I love but sometime wonder if the worry and headaches that go with it are worth it, but for now I think it is - besides I would be in tears selling my setup for probably half what I paid and knowing I am not upgrading to something better.

    Over 10 years ago I gave up carp fishing and had a few K's of gear then for all the over-nighters and also 3 high spec rods, reels, bite alarms etc. I was going to sell up but couldn't bear to part with it so it all got stored in garage.
    Then got back into it and really glad I kept the gear (Initially), trouble was after a few sessions I saw all the new gear available and wanted it and of course bought it. 
    I think I would be the same with the astro stuff so if I gave up for an extended period and if I stored it then years later would want the latest camera and probably a new scope. Mount I probably would be happy with.

    Steve

    Thanks Steve, bar the retirement situation you sound in a very similar place to myself for sure.

    I agree tech moves on and especially atm the gear is worth a fair bit of money still so in my head this softens the blow a bit when contemplating getting rid of it all. I just know in my mind when summer comes (except the late nights) i will really miss it.

    I keep asking myself what is it ill miss exactly? It used to be about the "buzz" of that first sub come through and seeing what detail your looking at for the rest of the session, at least on my last few it become more of a routine and not so much buzz, mainly due to the fact i was starting to image things i have imaged before. now i know there's A LOT to image in the night sky but unless i move or go to a dark site i can only see the same targets each year, do i really want to keep imaging the same targets each year?!

    I'm contemplating seriously down sizing all my gear and have the bare minimum but the mount is the kicker! imo its the most important part of it and also good money. 

    • Like 1
  8. 5 minutes ago, johninderby said:

    The same thoughts of selling off everything are pretty common I’d think. Particularily on a cloudy night.

    I have often thought of downsizing and keeping say just three scopes. The ones that get used most and selling the others and using the money for other hobbies.🤔

    If you have the luxury of having various imaging scopes and set up then thats what i would do! I have a viewing set up and an imaging set up, the imaging is the one im really contemplating selling.

  9. 15 minutes ago, kirkster501 said:

    All of us in the UK go through this doubt because of the weather.   There can't be many places in the world more poorly positioned to be doing astro imaging than in the UK, there have been no clear nights in Nottingham without the moon since the start of November and I have counted on one hand the clear nights where I can do AP since last June.  That's a lot of £££ per use.   I'll say for sure I am making no further large investments into dedicated scopes and cameras/filters, I am becoming more of a DSLR lens imager.  I would love a C11 Edge but I cannot justify it for the use it will get (or not).

    That's a good train of thought, maybe i could downsize back to what i started with, a dslr and lens etc and still have that there if i require. thats another ave to look at for sure. 

    yes your right, i used to spend all day in this forum and astro buy/sell scouting pages for things to buy :) i havent been on either for months! 

  10. 1 minute ago, John said:

    You can still be into astronomy without having loads of kit.

    I sold my scope when our kids came along and had around 10 years without anything other than binoculars , a few books and "Astronomy Now" magazine. No forums back then either. The interest in space and astronomy did not go away though.

    By the time I was in a position, and had the desire, to buy a decent scope again, the price of equipment had actually come down quite a bit, relatively speaking, so for a relatively modest sum I was able to get a good scope and re-learned how to observe.

    It is only a hobby. We should never feel trapped by it. People are welcome on SGL armed with nothing other than an interest :icon_biggrin:

    Thanks John,  I share your views and probably should have mentioned in my main post that I'd be keeping my viewing set up its the photography side I'm looking to sell.

    I agree, the passion for "space" never dies, a true wonder!

    • Like 1
  11. 2 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

    I packed my kit away for about 6-7 years, and then in 2017 I just got the bug again.  If you can hold onto it for a while then that might be the best plan.  I had a few items - cameras particularly - that dated badly over the time I stored them and became virtually worthless!

    Thank you, I no doubt think I'll be back but your last statement is what's driving me atm. 

     

    My cam will fetch a decent sum atm and I'm worried I'm going to feel like this again soon and I'll lose the price tag on the gear. 

     

    I hate that I'm even thinking this tbh as I never imagined being in this train of thought.

  12. Thanks Andy! 

    This is my thoughts,  although I love the hobby I'm wondering if at this stage in my life I should sell up and maybe come back when I retire? I have a 2 year old son and would love him to learn the night sky but he's a fair bit off that yet. I'd be keeping my viewing scope but selling my astrophotography gear.

     

    I think if im honest the time away has made me intimidated to come back, I feel like I've lost all the knowledge of my gear that I knew so well.

     

    I think when I get a clear night I owe it to myself to get out there ans see if that love is back or not.

    • Thanks 1
  13. Hi,

    People that have sold there Astro gear, did you regret it? Did you end up buying again later down the line? Did you think about doing it but didn't? 

    I'm at a cross roads atm, this autum/winter has been terrible in the UK and have probably been out twice in 3 months... I have about 2.5k's worth of kit and really don't know what to do!

    I love this hobby but the time away from it has made me wonder whether the money is better spent else where.

    I know you can't make the deciding factor for me but just intrigued in hearing others stories if they have been in a similar place.

     

    Edit..I'd be keeping my viewing set up, I'd be looking to sell the photography side of my equipment.

    Many thanks

  14. On 10/10/2020 at 14:47, AstroRookie said:

    Wow, impressive images! I regret having made my comment about the amp-glow, but what you want, I'm

    AstroRookie

    No regrets needed :) it has amp glow you advised but not an issue with good calibration frames. Best to find the right fit for your equipment with the link I supplied. 

     

    Clear skies 

  15. HI, 

    I'm used to imaging DSO with my frac setup but id like to dust the 127 mak off tonight and try grab some images of mars. I have a 120mm-s and a 294mc pro. I dont have LRGB filters for the 120 so would like to try the 294mc pro on the mak.

     

    Ill be using a 2x barlow,

    -Should i bin when imaging mars with this cam?

    -recommended number of frames to grab?

     

     

     

  16. Just now, SyedT said:

    When I was using a ZWO ASI 1600MM, I found that it was very sensitive to even slight changes in settings/stray light. You're doing the right thing by using flat darks, as the low exposure time for bias settings can cause the camera to behave unpredictably from my experiences. 

    I would suggest you check your settings, and even if they're fine, to re-take the flats with the rest of the scope/camera covered up to ensure there's no stray light entering the imaging train.

    Will do that for sure. the weird thing is it happens when using the L-Enhance and not the Lpro so i dont know if its related to the filter/cam combo or not? tbh ive read a few issues with this combo but its very widely used so cant see it being at fault. Ill dive into the flats wizard settings again and see if i haven't updated something. ive got a feeling i slightly changed my gain and offset since the last flats run ...

  17. 16 minutes ago, SyedT said:

    What ADU/histogram value did you aim for when taking the flats? It looks like the flats are over-correcting. 

    the flats were generated via N.I.N.A 's flats wizard I've never had an issue with the flats wizard before so may check to see the settings are ok after the recent update i guess, but you could be right here...

  18. On 16/09/2020 at 18:30, david_taurus83 said:

    No darks? The flat darks only calibrate the flat frames. You need 240s darks at the same gain and offset to calibrate the lights. That should sort out the amp glow.

    Apologies i didnt get notified about your reply. its not the amp glow that concerns me as i can get rid of that, its the red outer rings everywhere thats my issue

  19. Hi, Long story short....

    36 days and counting before i managed to get back out under the night sky and start imaging again! Needless to say i felt like i had never imaged before it felt soooo long!

    Anyways, i shot 6 hours on the Heart nebula and to say im disappointed with the final stack is an understatement, it looked A MESS! possibly the worse acquisition ive carried out. Now ive seen this issue before but properly calibrated frames has always resolved this but this time however no calibration frames at all worked better then any! Please see below final stack and DBE carried out with flats and flat dark's and same again without any calibration frames at all. it seems my calibration frames are not subtracting but instead adding to my image??

    Any ideas would be greatly appreciated , ive also added my final edit of this target from the data i had and to get the best out of it i went starless...

     

    Cam used is a Asi 294mc pro with the optolong Lenhance filter shot at 240sec x 89 over 2 nights. calibration frames (flats/flat darks taken on both nights) seeing wasnt the greatest...

     

    Dan

    Starless Heart Nebula.jpg

    no calibration.png

    calibration frames.png

  20. 12 minutes ago, Aramcheck said:

    It's in the 'Bonus Content' image gallery. The web address is on page 5 of the magazine near the top right of the page.

    Nice image BTW.

    Cheers
    Ivor

    Thank you so much Ivor, really appreciate you finding that for me.

    Thank you for the nice comment, 

    Cheers

    Dan 

    • Like 1
  21. Hi all, I have a subscription with SAN but in hard copy format, a little birdie has told me that they have put my first ever M51 image on display on the digital edition ! It was actually  my 3rd image I had  ever taken with a sub 1k budget set up! 

     

    Anyone have sept digital edition and could look for me please? 

    Many thanks

    Dan 

  22. 10 minutes ago, merlin100 said:

    Observe.  I'd be happy just to see a faint smudge.😉

    :) ive not long had my mak and was wowed by Jupiter and saturn the other week. im thinking of putting the camera down the next couple of clear nights and do some good observing 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.