Chris49
Members-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
11 GoodProfile Information
-
Location
Haywards Heath
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Chris49 started following Leo Galaxy Cluster, Well, Just, lol.
-
With longer than 90 sec subs, the stars start to become sausages. This is I believe the result of flexure between the main and the guide scope. I have now improved the guide scope rigidity by putting it in rings on top of the main scope, but I haven't had a chance to try this yet - part of the back garden was underwater this morning. 🙁 Your NGC891 is stunning - thanks for showing me what can be done. Chris
-
I see what you are getting at, but I come back to the HFR values that I get for the stars in the subs with Sequence Generator Pro - these range from 3.5 to 6. When I watch videos of people using SGP, they get values as low as 1.2 so my stars are large at that stage. I suspect they then get bigger still with my attempts at processing, probably because I have stretched them too much. Your comments are certainly making me think!! Thanks Chris
-
I did watch your video last night and it looks very useful. I'm such a novice with processing that I will need to follow it through step-by-step with an example of my own to understand it. I have CS6 - yours may be a different version but I guess that won't matter. Your star reduction certainly shows an improvement on my picture. Thanks Chris
-
You are right, they are not. So I was just lucky they came out roughly round! Back to improving the guiding! Thanks Chris
-
You are right of course, but I think it is a case of "small steps" to make progress without getting discouraged. I am a bit wary of the OAG because people say they are hard to use. I hope to get there eventually! Thanks for the advice. Chris
-
I'm not too far off then. Thanks for posting your image. Chris
-
The guide scope is the standard Celestron 50mm finder #51611 and holder that comes with the EdgeHD8 - not very satisfactory as it is not rigid. Guide cam is SX Ultrastar. I have since moved it to rings mounted on a Vixen dovetail on top of the main tube. This is much more rigid and is symmetrical for balance so that should help. Mount is iOptron GEM45 - just getting used to it, but I am impressed so far, way better than my A-VX which had so much Dec backlash that it never came back! Thanks for the encouragement! Chris
-
There I was thinking 10 minutes processing was a bit excessive - I was hoping my subs were going to be nearly perfect straight out of the camera 😀. Chris
-
That sounds a really clever technique. There's a lot to this astro stuff when you get into it! Thanks Chris
-
I don't think it does reject UV, hence my worry that UV might be out of focus and lead to blobby stars. I thought that was more a problem with refractors than reflectors though, although there is the corrector plate I suppose. I do have an LP filter to try, but although Clear Outside says I have Bortle 4, I find that hard to believe! I will search for PS star reduction as you suggest. Thanks Chris
-
Thank you Carole. I will be more careful next time. So far I have had very little idea what I am trying to do and even less about how to do it! It's all part of the learning curve. Chris
-
Thanks Vlaiv, that's very helpful. I guess I have been unrealistic up to now. I will work towards what you suggest. Chris
-
Stacked in DSS, stretched a bit in Photoshop - I may well have clipped off the brighter stars. Chris
-
A lot to think about here. Clearly I will try to find a place to put the filter and concentrate on improving the guiding. Also maybe I should include the #94242 0.7x reducer - I was trying without because it is the tiny galaxies that I'm really after. Thank you for your advice. Chris