Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

msacco

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by msacco

  1. 1 minute ago, tooth_dr said:

    Also if I can add, I wouldnt bother stacking my lights if I dont have flats, flats are pretty much crucial.  You had a lot of vignetting that was very difficult to remove.

    I had dust on the camera sensor, but I don't think flats should help with vignetting? Unfortunately due to a few technical issues I couldn't take flats, so this is what I ended up with. I'll probably image that once more when I'll get all my issues sorted out, and maybe even from an actual dark bortle 3 site instead of bortle 5.

    Just now, tooth_dr said:

    Sorry I have literally ZERO knowledge of PI.

    I believe I'd want to also learn how to use photoshop well, so this is still really useful :)

  2. 6 hours ago, JSeaman said:

    It downloaded but I couldn't open the RAR file, got 7zip on it and worked, try this one ...

    Edit.jpg

    2 hours ago, GraemeH said:

    Thank you for sharing your stacked data - when the weather doesn't allow for collecting new data, it's fun to do some processing.  I've played around in Photoshop with your stacked image and come up with this - I hope you like it - I'm still very much a novice at this.

    Graeme

    M42_STACK.png

     

    3 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

    Thanks for the data, had a quick go at processing it there now.

     

    M42_STACK-lpc-cbg-Stmed.jpg

    Thanks a lot for the help guys, that's a really nice outcome! I like the fact that the core of the nebula isn't burned like in my image.

    If you could share a bit about the process you've done it would be plenty useful, thanks :)

     

  3. 4 hours ago, JSeaman said:

    I'm afriad I can't do too much as I grabbed your RAR file but it wouldn't open. Just using the above image I dropped it down a notch in brightness so there was a core and removed a bit of the green but this is crude ...

    M42_2.thumb.jpg.ef3ee5edce0cb7fce31b8a7be6a5515b.jpg

    Any reason you didn't manage to download it?

    1 hour ago, wornish said:

    Probably overdone it but this is just 10 min using Photoshop.

     

     

    test.jpg

    Wow this is interesting....Yes I think it's a bit overdone and looks kinda "paintish" to me, but that's still really amazing, would you mind sharing with me a bit about it?

  4. Just now, Adam J said:

    The thing I would note here is that QHY would see to have a better reliability record with the larger sensors than ZWO, there is a new full frame coming out from both makes, I would be considering the QHY if it was me irrespective of it costing more. 

    Well I just bought this camera recently, so getting a new camera is completely out of the question. 😕

  5. Hi guys! I've imaged M42 recently and would like to get some help with processing it, as I don't really manage to get anything 'more' out of it.

    These are 2 images I've got from it:
    M42_2.thumb.jpg.ef3ee5edce0cb7fce31b8a7be6a5515b.jpg

    M42_3.thumb.jpg.0bd1c5c000fca1f4f5559fe1300fb4e9.jpg

     

    I just feel like there's much more that can be done with it, but whatever I'm trying I just seem to ruin it.

    Here is the stacked image(uploaded in xisf/tiff/fits format):
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Eb0BI_F0AaVdh0cZieYmQIbuX_Me0MU/view

    Unfortunately I imaged it without the camera cooling as I'm currently having issues with that, and I didn't had the chance to take flats, so there is some dust on the camera sensor as shown in the pictures.

    I've tried working with pixinsight, but I'm not sure where else to go with this and would love to get some advices :)

    About the equipment I've used:
    Skywatcher 200p(f/5) with EQ5 and ZWO ASI071MC pro(without cooling). Thanks for the help!

  6. 42 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

    Neutrik. they also do Speakercon take any size cable you're likely to use

    Just about see that mine have individual fuses behind them.

    Dave

    Wow, this cable looks amazing I think I'll get this one..

    Edit - So I just notice that the female(i think) of this cable does require soldering, the connectors are also very very close to each other, so I'll need to rethink about this. Maybe soldering the GX16 will be easier than this.

  7. 1 minute ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

    Definitely not. You need a suitable fuse somewhere. No need to fuse everything separate but a suitable sized fuse, 5A maybe depending on what you intend to run, needs to be after the battery in the +12V side.

    Steve

    I believe I would rather have a separate fuse for almost each component I'm using.

    Camera + guiding camera with probably 3-5A fuse, the mount with 3A fuse I believe, and my laptop which will need 5A fuse as well. That sounds better to me than using a 10-15A fuse for all of them doesn't it?

    • Like 2
  8. 1 minute ago, Davey-T said:

    You can use speaker connectors if it's for a power pack, I use similar Powecon connectors, no soldering and lock.

    Dave

    Powercon.png.06d870bb1382744a4d16b5ca53900add.png

     

    That seems very interesting! Can you tell me what is the name of the connector? And what is the maximum cable gauge I can use?

    Thanks! :)

  9. 6 minutes ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

    I use these, they screw together, take heavy currents and cheap. Might be an issue if your soldering is not up to it though.

    GX16-2-Pin-16mm-Aviation-Automotive-Connector-Female-Socket-Male-Plug

    Steve

    My solder is rather old, so I would try to avoid soldering as I fear it won't be good enough and eventually create more issues in the long run.

    Do you have any alternative for the power pole fuse box as well? I could probably make something similar maybe, how are you wiring that? And do plug it straight forward from the 12v battery to the mount/other equipments? (with a fuse I assume)

  10. Hello guys, up until now I've been using car socket to power up my equipment, I'm now looking for a more reliable DC connectors and I'd love to hear some recommendations.

    I would like to keep it on a rather low budget, I did see a lot of recommendations about power pole/anderson connector, it does look like a great connector, and I thought about getting the following fuse splitter for it:

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/AP-8-8port-40A-ANDERSON-POWERPOLE-CONNECTOR-POWER-SPLITTER-DISTRIBUTOR-SOURCE/143247534838?hash=item215a37eaf6:g:Eo4AAOSwZSFXJvh3

    It's rather expensive though, and I thought if maybe one of you would have a better idea in mind to achieve a similar solution as this. The basic idea is to get a good reliable 2 pin DC connector, I'd honeslty prefer one with screwing so it won't be able to split unless I screw it, and I also rather have a solderless solution, as that's usually easier to maintain and make.

    Any ideas would be appreciated, thanks! :)

  11. 9 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    The specs don't claim the tec will work reliably at 100% - as above, operation becomes unstable >90%. The spec only claims a delta of 35-40 deg below ambient within the given environmental limits.

    Louise

    Well I would expect ZWO to think about such situations when making a product. It's like making a computer with 5 GHz specs, but when the computer reaches that it crashes(BTW it's not far from the latest MAC at 4.8 GHz haha).

    If the camera can't handle 100% TEC, then don't let the camera reach 100% TEC no matter what.

  12. 5 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    I just read your posts on CN and see you bought it second hand. Reiterating the relevant specs:

    Cooling: Regulated Two Stage TEC
    Delta T: 35°C-40°C below ambient
    Cooler Power consumption: 12V at 3A Max
    Working Temperature: -5°C—45°C
    Storage Temperature: -20°C—60°C
    Working Relative Humidity: 20%—80%
    Storage Relative Humidity: 20%—95%

    You may be using the camera within spec but things can age and deteriorate. Under those circumstances you need to contact ASI and see about getting it serviced if it won't cool down to a delta of 35 deg. Only the surface of the TEC in contact with the sensor should get cold. The rest of the hardware - heatsink and fan, does it's best to take heat away from the 'hot' side of the TEC device. How well it does this depends on a number of factors. Personally, I wouldn't, and never have, attempted to run a cooled camera at 100% power. TEC devices are semiconductors and can quite easily fail under certain conditions.

    Louise

     

     

    2 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    From jdupton on CN:

    " The reason I suggest cooling to at least around 15 degrees below ambient is to operate the TEC in an easily controlled zone in order to attain temperature stability. When the TEC is operating at less than about 5% of its power level capability, the stability of the sensor temperature will usually be less controlled compared to when the TEC is operating at about 30% power level. Conversely, then the TEC is operating above 80% power, self heating of the sensor by the camera body can start to affect temperature stability.

     

       I have recently run tests of this on my ASI294MC camera. I found that as the TEC approached 90% to 100% of power, the actual temperature of the sensor started rising due to excess heat from the TEC being dumped into the body of the camera. That in turn, raised the temperature of the sensor and reduced the stability of the temperature since the TEC is cooling the back of the sensor and the circuit boards to which the sensor is attached are warming the sensor. In my camera, this leads to an instability of the actual sensor temperature over the period of an imaging session.*

    Thanks for the comment, I do trust the seller, he said that he only used it about 3 times and after few uses of mine it already looked more used than what I recieved it, so I believe the camera supposed to work well.

    He also got the camera from Sam because he helped translate the manual.

    That doesn't mean it's not possible that the camera is faulty.

    I'm aware of the fact that cooling at 100% is not recommended or even useful at all, yet I would love to understand where the issue is coming from.

    ZWO told me they'd want to have a teamviewer session and see the issue, would make sense to me that they would simply tell me to send it to repair, but I don't know what will happen with shipping..

  13. 6 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    I think most modern tecs have a delta of 40 deg. So at 30 deg you should be able to reach -10 deg. Therefore you shouldn't set your target to lower. The camera should be able to reach -10 but it will draw a max current. There may also be a maximum ambient operating temperature and humidity specified by the manufacturer. If you're unhappy with the camera you could ask the seller for a refund.

    Louise

    But once again, it doesn't matter if the camera is able to reach temperature x or not, it should still be able to run at 100% TEC without any issues, whether it managed to reach the temperature I've set it to or not.

    4 hours ago, artem said:

    Are you using any USB HUB ?? 

    No, I'm not using a USB hub.

  14. 12 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    What's your ambient night time temperature?

    I was in my room, so probably around 20-30C. But I don't think it should be related in any way..It doesn't matter what temperature the camera is trying to reach, it should still be able to run at 100% TEC. Whether it actually manages to cool down or not is a different story, but I don't think it should be related?

  15. 4 hours ago, Adam J said:

    I would think that this is a case of insufficient current being supplied drawing down the voltage. Try a volt meter to measure the volts being supplied as the cooler maxes out. It's not a great idea to be running at max delta anyhow. 

    As far as I know it's not something that could happen with 220V AC, but only in 12V DC which caused the fuse to burn.

  16. Hello, I'm having an issue with my ASI071MC pro. I've been struggling with this for a while now, and came up with the following conclusions:
    Somehow when the cooling of the camera reaches high TEC(90-100%), it causes the camera to crash. I know it sounds weird, but I'll try explaining as much as I can.

    The reason I believe is not a software issue, is that I've had the same results on 2 different machines, on 2 different OS(one running W7 and the other W10), on 3 different programs(ASICAP, SharpCap, SGP) - I had the exact same results on both. The issue also happened when the cooling reached high TEC(around 90-100%), I tried running the cooling for very very long on low power, and everything still worked just fine, only when I rose the power to around 100%, the issue appeared.

    What actually happens when the issue occurs?
    On SGP, if I'm taking frames once it happens it's simply stuck on downloading the frame, until eventually after really really long I believe it will say that it wasn't able to download the frame.

    On SharpCap it simply drops the frame and keeps capturing, that is until I click on the 'Cameras' menu, and then it simply "throws" my camera and disconnects it.
    I tried to contact ZWO, still waiting for their reply, I also didn't found anything related to that anywhere, so I guess I'm the first one with the issue.

    Some technical details:
    I've tried using different cables, both USB2/3.
    I tried different power supply, mainly with 12V 5A one which should be more than enough.
    I tried 2 machines as I stated above.

    One more thing that happened to me, I tried using the camera in the field with my 12V 75AH battery, I don't know it for sure, but I believe that once the cooler reached high TEC of 90-100%, my 5A fuse got burned, which is extremely weired as the camera should only draw 3A max(even with slightly more). This thing happened to me 3 times, so I believe there's something wrong there.

    Here is a(very very very poor) video of me showing how sharpcap starts dropping frames when the TEC rises:
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PWKP2ARaL7CapfPqw91SJmiLn5g2qYV0/view

    Any ideas would be much appreciated! Thanks!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.