Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Vroobel

Members
  • Posts

    789
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Vroobel

  1. The bottom one is the Altair Starwave 102/1122 ED (FPL-51) - the excellent planet killer. They do it, together with the TS and I think also other brands. Recently even the TecnoSky released very similar tube, if I'm not wrog it has 1100mm fl.
    The top one is the great Vixen A80M Japan (not the A80Mf). That's why I want to finally compare them. 🙂

    • Like 1
  2. 12 minutes ago, Franklin said:

    I agree, I had one of those Altair F/11 102ED's and it was great for high power stuff but, as you say, to keep costs down they've skimped on the rings and dovetail. I put an extra long, extra wide bar on mine so the rings could be attached with 2 bolts each. It's not that heavy but it is quite long and I wanted a more robust connection to the mount. In the end I used it mainly with the lower extension tube removed for binoviewing. Great scope for the money if lunar/planetary/double stars is your thing.

    Something like that? There is the original Vixen/SW style bar underneath.

    I'm ready for a direct comparison, but still something else is to do. 😐

    BTW, the focuser 10:1 reductor also works not so smooth like the one attached to the triplet, but it's better than nothing.

     

    IMG_20220923_135042.thumb.jpg.e2c90f7a8e8bee06a0c75a67c47f8f13.jpg

    IMG_20220923_183926.thumb.jpg.3dedff992774014a42e27a51c34b23c5.jpg

    IMG_20220923_135151.thumb.jpg.b5cb9efb891623f47b946d5250e102d9.jpg

    • Like 5
  3. On 26/12/2022 at 05:14, Sunshine said:

    It’s a refractorpalooza!

    Presently they have two different purposes. The triplet is of course for astrophotography, while the planet killer is to allow me to spend time nice, when the first one work hard. 

    I wrote that the triplet is better, but I mean it's better made. It's quality is not only because of better glass, 7-8 years difference in the production brought huge savings in materials. Look please at the rings used. Even the modern knobs are empty inside. 

    Recently I found that my stepper motor attached to the focuser in professional way lifts the planet in the field or drops it slightly while refocusing. The triplet keeps the planet in one place. Without the motor I was unable to observe it. 

     

    IMG_20221209_131611.thumb.jpg.01b2141254d67f898a4992d23f574922.jpg

     

    I love the F/11 scope. It has perfect correction confirmed by star test and the Ronchi test, it allows to watch planets in magnification 250x and the Moon in 320x (with proper Ortho EPs) with no aberration at all. It's cheap and I highly recommend it to planet watchers. But they have to forgive the savings... 

    • Like 3
  4. Hi, 

    I'm sorry that I stopped reporting about the progress somewhere in middle, but the life plots its own scenario. I was focused more on the mount than on writing about it. 

    Actually, I can say that the most important work is done. Of course, we can always find something to improve, but the mount works and it works satisfactorily. 

    Everyone happy to pass quickly through the history of its building within 18 mins is welcome to my channel. 

     

    • Like 11
  5. Hi,

    The Soul is added to the set, to the Heart. :)

    Altair 102/715 EDT, Optolong L-eXtreme, Planostar x1.0 FF, EOS 6D mod.
    96 (80%) z 121 x 240s  (6h 24m) + 3x25 calibration frames.

     

    1812847699_SoulNebula01APASTAP2.thumb.jpg.01c5ef74645cd5b712e7c30d83ac3fc4.jpg

     

    Here is its a little bit darker version, not so burnt.

     

    958523368_SoulNebula01APASTAP3.thumb.jpg.1c55d1e2de04daa93e8414b6941ed4d5.jpg

     

    Another change, the background is dimmer now to better match the Heart Nebula taken two days earlier, which is very close.

     

    1073545408_SoulNebula01APASTAP4.thumb.jpg.49b964456a8ce26df4200140e9efa1da.jpg

  6. Hi,

    One week later I aimed my mount at the same DSO, but significant change happened in the meantime. Instead of the 17kg 10" 1270mm Newtonian OTA a medium size refractor hung on top of the fork. It is an Altair Wave 102/715 EDT triplet APO that weighs 1/3 of the Newtonian OTA weight, so I expected much better stars on the final picture, even if the guiding didn't change too much. Its focal length is about twice shorter, so I can reach DSOs usually unreachable for the 1270mm reflector.

    I decided to perform a series of 10 min exposures to increase a number of fotons. The composition is similar to the previous one just for comparison.

     

    Altair 102/715 EDT, Optolong L-eXtreme, Planostar x1.0 FF, EOS 6D mod.
    21 x 600s, ISO1600 + 3x25 calibration frames.

     

    1701659447_HeartNebula03.thumb.jpg.82a33470b267cbd6ecb2cf0cd72dea32.jpg

    • Like 1
  7. Hi,

    Thanks to @tomato I am a new owner of the Altair 102/715 EDT triplet APO equipped with a dedicated 3" x1.0 field flattener and simple moto-focuser. Printing some important accessories and adapting my ATM EQ fork mount to such a small OTA took me several days. The shelf made with a piece of plywood is a temporary solution to check all calculated forces and outcoming balance. I'm going to replace it with an aluminium plate that is heavier and will also work as a counterbalance. The shelf will be ready for something like RC8.

    Everything works superb and my mount discovered its new face. The big, 17kg 10" Bresser-Messier Newtonian generates big inertia, so I never could set a guiding in Dec in the Auto mode. Now I see it's possible. Also, possible became performing 600s long subs (or longer, depending on the guiding). 😲

    Now I learn a new way with the Heart Nebula. 

    The unexpected benefit of replacing the OTAs is that I can take the shelf with the OTA and the camera attached home to do flat frames.

    IMG_20221213_194945.thumb.jpg.77ce831a94314f56fe594af6735a09d9.jpg

    IMG_20221213_200305.thumb.jpg.3b4909a8612ffaf0ab8bcd36e0d1d0dc.jpg

    • Like 8
  8. On 10/12/2022 at 17:43, powerlord said:

    First light for eq6r-Pro no 2. After a brief affair with a zwo am5, we parted company, and a decided to go with old faithful.

    Not great forecast tonight, but just wanted to get it tried out!

    2 eq6rs, 2 asi2600s. One tonight with a sy135,  the other with a redcat

     

    20221210_173527.jpg

    20221210_173108.jpg

    My first impression was that it's a big hole in the ground with a concrete ring inside protruding half a meter over. :) It would be a great idea if not for the worse view (houses and trees).

    • Like 1
  9. Hi,

    This time I follwed the PHD2 developers guidance: if the mount has a significant backlash in the Dec axis, then the PA should show error, but no bigger than 10'. It was 9.5'. 

    2022.12.07: The Fish Head Nebula, but I would rather say a Veiltail... :) 
    Newton 9" F/5.5, Optolong L-eXtreme, MPCC III, EOS 6D mod.
    35 of 42 x 300s, ISO1600, 3x25 calibrating frames.
     

    1349612817_ASTAP02(35)2.thumb.jpg.812c4f6ec3b6443134772eb7e1656b1a.jpg

     

    The stars are finally sharp and quite round. And this is the best PHD2 graph I ever obtained. To be honest, it wasn't like that all the time on that night, but it doesn't change my satisfaction. 🙂

     

    PHD2_2022_12_07.thumb.jpg.ed4b2577d27e2ff88c5c9a0033aa3ac0.jpg

     

     

    • Like 1
  10. 2 minutes ago, Captain Scarlet said:

    This was my Orion-Helmerichs 200 newt on Skytee2, after Mars’ occultation but before re-emergence. Quite incredible the image-stabilization and quality of mobile phone cameras these days. They were 2-3 second handheld exposures!

    Magnus

     

    4E863CF2-DC03-4920-8F3A-6F63E310AE97.jpeg

    6CA8CEAA-82BC-4C57-A912-F47BBADB071D.jpeg

    I'd like to be there now... 🤩

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.