Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

kbrown

Members
  • Content Count

    180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

165 Excellent

About kbrown

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Location
    London
  1. I did actually fire up adjacent scope a couple of times but couldn't do it exactly at the time the other scope saw the blob because someone else was using it. Anyway, the other scope didn't see anything unusual in 90s Luminance Bin2 at least...
  2. Well, it did appear again in slightly different position and shape. And again only in one 600s sub (out of 8). Maybe Olly is right after all. It's just an unlucky reflection of something in the OTA... Certainly got my imagination on overdrive ? Could be the Klingons too as pointed out my sister ?
  3. Here they are, side by side at 100% resolution. Not sure about the random reflection theory. I imaged these with a robotic telescope in AstroCamp at Nerpio, Spain (MPC Code I89). As I said in my blog post I imaged tons of LRGB and Ha data but the blob just appeared in these two subs. I will be imaging it again tonight. I'll keep you posted...
  4. I am puzzled about what I saw in M82 at two different nights recently. More info and a video clip here: http://www.spellboundfx.com/2019/02/24/m82-oddity/ Any ideas?
  5. Thanks guys! The power bank is this one: https://www.amazon.com/MoKo-Multi-function-Emergency-Cigarette-Flashlight/dp/B01J0RXAV4 It has received mixed reviews but mine has been okay so far. I've only ran a single dew heater of it so far though. Had no trouble keeping it on for 5 hours straight in sub-zero temperatures. I think it had about 60% left when I re-charged it. Remains to be seen what happens when I put my cooled CCD, filterwheel and focuser behind it. Might have to get another one as a backup and come up with some kind of a hot swap system...
  6. Long time no updates. This project is still alive though. Finally getting somewhere with it. I now have a way to attach the battery, raspberry pi, usb hub and a gps module to the tray without having to modify them. All that is left to do is the power distribution and wiring really. Topside. Just the USB hub here at the moment. Underside. Battery, Raspberry Pi and GPS module. Here's how it sits on the tripod.
  7. Possibly. You can bias the exposure down a few stops though. I'll do some tests before the event begins. Guess the metering mode will affect things too. What is APT? Sounds like your approach will yield to less flickering.
  8. Hello, Weather permitting I'm planning to go and image the upcoming lunar eclipse on Monday morning 21st. I'm thinking of attaching a Canon 60D on my Skywatcher 250PX Newt (10" / 1200mm x 0.9). The entire moon will fit in the image leaving some background around it. The scope will be on an NEQ6 mount which will be guided if I can find a suitable star in the guider scope FOV. I'd like to take a time lapse of the whole event which I can do using Magic Lantern on the camera. My only concern is the exposure as the brightness of the moon will vary a lot during the eclipse. Do you think I could rely on one the Camera's pre-programmed exposure modes such as the AV mode where everything else is locked except the length of exposure? Obviously this will lead to some flickering in the final result but that can be smoothed out later. Any other tips are welcomed too! Ta, Kari
  9. While I could just use my camera ball head attached on the free bolt on the L-bracket and make an adapter that would allow me to put the finder scope on it, I thought I'd explore my original idea a bit further. Mainly to see if I can overcome the challenges I've faced and learn something but also to keep the overall weight of the kit down. Here's a clamp style variation that seems to hold up a lot better than my original design. I printed it in two parts and glued them together. This allowed me to print them in orientation optimal to the structural stresses when in use. I can now tighten the M6 wingbolt quite hard and it's not crackling at all. It's also quite easy to roughly match the DEC angles between the primary and guide scope.
  10. Bah. Don't think this design will hold up as is. Not 3D printed at least. No matter which way I print it, it will crack (layer separation) when I tighten the locking screw. Might have to thread the end of the rod and fasten it between two nuts or something...
  11. I feel ya... Living in London without a garden and working fulltime doesn't help either. Some statistics say that at any given moment 75% of the planet earth is covered in clouds... Booo!
  12. Exactly. I remember someone here (thinking of) putting the battery there. Perfect counterweight and would serve a purpose.
  13. I'd rather have it at this end of the rod than on top of the scope as I'm already pushing the capabilities of this little tracker with all my gear attached.
  14. I'm sure it'll work as the calibration figures out which way it should do the corrections...
  15. Inspired by an article I saw online a while back I thought I'd design and print a similar guider scope holder for my Skywatcher Staradventurer's counterweight shaft. It'll be RA guiding only but I'm hoping to at least improve the nasty periodic error it seems to suffer from. The holder accepts the standard Skywatcher finder scope shoe. I've put helicoil thread inserts in the holes for the locking screws so it should last a bit better. Only issue I have is the structural strength of it. I get layer separation if I tighten the butterfly screw too much. I'll print another one in another orientation to see if that's stronger / strong enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.