Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Demonperformer

Members
  • Posts

    7,699
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Demonperformer

  1. I don't know this precise mount, but features state that the firmware is "upgradeable via the internet". Is that worth a try in case there is a glitch in the programming on your handset? Not a high probability, but you seem to have addressed all the common issues. It sounds to me like it is confusing N/S, but why it would do that I have no idea.

  2. Hi, AA&D, and welcome to the forum.

    We live in exciting times for those wishing to become astronauts, what with the arrival SpaceX and "commercial" spaceflight. Don't let anyone steal that dream!

    Enjoy the journey.

    • Thanks 1
  3. Hi, Entrpy53, and welcome to SGL.

    I can't give you specific advice to your question, but aperture can help cut through light pollution to some extent. But nothing beats being able to get a scope under a dark sky. I don't know how "mobile" you are and if getting away from the city is a possibility for you. But, if it is, I would definitely factor that into your upgrade. You will be able to purchase a bigger dobsonian for a similar sum compared to the 130mm. [Yes, I hate it as well when someone comes along and tells me to consider a different purchase than the one I have decided upon!]

    Another thing to consider is that, whilst adding extras may seem a cheap way of getting extra kit, every piece of glass you add to the system (like reducers) reduce the quality of what you are seeing to some extent.

    The only other thing I can recommend is that you go for one scope (only) first. Decide where your main passion lies (planets & moon or deep sky objects) and get the one best suited to that. Then, when you have experience with that one, you will be in a better position to decide how to extend your kit.

    Enjoy the journey.

    • Like 1
  4. The thing I find interesting about that photo is the way you have stars in focus behind the bird's nest, which "common sense" would tell you should be blocked by it. Of course due to the way the light through every part of the objective focusses on that single point, but I just like it when "common sense" is proved not to be. Always assuming that you don't have a really bad hot pixel problem ...

    • Like 1
  5. Hi, WSG, and welcome to SGL.

    I have a pair of 15x70s and they work very well on a cheap monopod (something like this). I use them seated, with the monopod leaning slightly backwards into me, so that the bins stay fixed to my eyes. Rock steady.

    Enjoy the journey.

  6. Definitely a worthwhile evening.

    My personal hate is diffraction spikes on stars, which I can only assume you added in processing as it is a refractor. That said, it is your picture and you should never let anyone talk you out of what you like.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.