Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Demonperformer

Members
  • Posts

    7,704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Demonperformer

  1. Hi, Andy, and welcome to SGL.

    I used nothing but a pair of 7x50s for decades. Still have them in my arsenal, and often get them out while the gear is imaging and just cruise the skies. Still come across new things.

    The 200 dob is a great starter instrument. Is there an astro society near you (surely got to be one somewhere within striking distance of Bristol)? Before purchase, how about going along and seeing them. Societies often hold open "viewing" evenings when you would have the opportunity of having a look through various scopes. It would also give you a chance to see the physical bulk of some telescopes. I wish I had done that before purchasing a 10" dob (long gone now) ... totally unsuitable for my circumstances (although others get on with them very well). Nothing beats seeing a scope "in the flesh" for working out how well you will get on with it ...

    Enjoy the journey.

    • Thanks 1
  2. I would hope a tracked mount is what is meant. Without any tracking, even 30s would be severely limiting in terms of focal length.

    But you've got me thinking about PEC: apparently there are two sorts, one is dumb and the other reacts to what is happening "live". So, if you had been running an imaging session on an object, it would be learning what is happening to the mount in that session. This means that a sub taken at the end of the session would be more accurately tracked than one at the start of the session.

    This is, as davew said, not as easy as it first appears ...

    • Thanks 1
  3. 50 minutes ago, noah4x4 said:

    The only solution is turn off internal GPS  and use the hand controller for manual data input.

    which defeats the whole object of paying extra for the gps system, surely.

    Hopefully (?!) Celestron will be working on a solution ... although, as it was predicted, one might have hoped they would have produced a solution BEFORE it happened [sorry ... stupid suggestion ... where did i put my meds? ...]

  4. On 16/10/2009 at 15:19, RobH said:

    Gone are the days of the local ironmongers unfortunately, where you could buy nails by the pound, in eco friendly paper bags!

    We still have one of those in Poole, Boones (they don't have a website but are listed on loads of the yelp-type sites). I can't praise them highly enough. They are the sort of shop you can go in with a nut and say "I want something that will fit this" and they find it and will sell you one. Brilliant.

    • Like 1
  5. I am no expert on collimation (only just beginning to tackle it myself), but I think the black circle is supposed to be perfectly central and it looks offset to the right to me. I think this means you need to adjust the secondary a little.

    Golden rule: whatever you do, do it in small (very small) steps, so that it is easy to reverse it.

    • Thanks 1
  6. Some years ago I visited a cub camp with a scope for an evening. It was quite a dark location and, while setting up, I glanced upwards and had a quiet moan about the cloud that was invading a previously 100% clear sky - until I realised it was actually the summer milky way. Just not used to seeing any of it from home. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  7. I wonder if it has anything to do with the increase in light pollution? Under a dark sky, you can see a lot more and under a heavy LP sky, even a small instrument, by darkening the background, simply enables you to simply "see" them.

    This suggests a practical experiment for me: produce a 40mm mask for my 4" frac and take it out and compare what I can see with it "under the streetlights" compared with no instrumentation - a sort of "count the stars I can see in the Pleiades" sort of thing ...

    Now, where's my "blue peter" kit?

    • Like 4
  8. 7 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

    There's a relatively new feature in PHD2 - you need the latest version - called 'predictive PEC' or PPEC. It 'learns' your system's behaviour over the first few cycles and then applies it, and  it constantly refines its model of the PEC. It does appear to work and I use it all the time now.

    That is definitely worth investigating. Will go looking ...

    Thanks.

  9. Sorry, realise yours is permanent and wasn't trying to hijack the thread (much!), but the process obviously takes a significant amount of time and was wondering if it was still a worthwhile option when all the gear is put back together each session in not necessarily exactly the same relative positions. If PEC is working out of step it would be likely to cause more problems than it solves?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.