-
Posts
1,391 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Waldemar
-
-
In spite of the fact that the filter is inside the already counted with tray, you will need to add 1/3 of the filter's thickness to the path.
So that will be 0,2 mm making 21,2 mm. Don't think those 0,2 mm don't matter because it is so little... it does!
You can accomplish this by adding a 0,2 mm shim to the filter tray. This info tells you which way to go if the image is not flat.FF distance to sensor.docx -
Astronomik filters are really top class.
-
-
-
I found that the tiniest bit of SuperLube prevents seizing for a very long time, and it does not run.
-
Good to hear everything is ok for you!
14 hours ago, LoveFromGallifrey said:Sorry, forgot to say it's the 120mm mini. And it definitely does support it. FLO, Rotherham Valley et al sell this camera as a bundle with the ASIair and a mini guidescope 🙂 totally my bad!
- 1
-
According to ZWO info the ASIair Pro does NOT support your ASI120MM camera...
-
On 10/06/2021 at 17:13, Starslayer said:
So sliding the tube forward should help?
Google for a video "how to balance my telescope mount"
-
balancing is your problem, nothing else
-
Forgot to mention that EOS adapters come in 2 sizes: T2 (M42) and M48. The latter is best for 2" nosepieces, and assures non vignetting.
- 1
-
+ nosepiece preferably 2" if that fits your focusser
-
When using IPA you should ware gloves. IPA dissolves skin grease and then leaves a haze on the 'cleaned' surfaces...
-
Hi Mike,
As far as I can see, no adapters for that camera are available... Not even a possibility for ep projection, other than holding the camera against the eyepiece.
Maybe a better option is to buy a 2nd hand canon body. They are cheap and available on the 2nd hand marketSucces!
Waldemar
- 1
-
3 hours ago, rob12770 said:
astrophotography, just something stable that tracks well and is pretty solid,
Rob, sorry, but those three things do not combine with cheap...
The cheapest way to get some decent results would be an EQ5 mount, though the sailing effect of your Explorer 130 may ask for a HEQ5. I realize this answer is not what you are waiting for, In order to to use the few opportunities to get images a go-to mount is a 'must' I believe. You do not want to waste your precious time with searching for objects you can't see.. That brings you to the realm of HEQ5-Pro synscan. With tripod that will cost you close to a 1000 new (many 2nd hand available, though)... But you will be able to make stunning images instead of getting frustrated- 4
-
Hi Ed,
There are no dumb questions, just stupid answers...
If you choose the right camera with the same or smaller diameter as the central obstruction, only two wires are in the field of view.
When tied behind each other the effect is not really visible, especially not when they are a little bended, like bended spider vanes.
I would not use a DSRL camera, for they are quite an obstruction. -
21 minutes ago, AstroRookie said:
It turns out it's just me ...
A friend suggested to shine with a flashlight into the holes, to see if there are threads present, and what do I see, there are already locking screws in the holes.
So this stupid here tried to screw locking screws into locking screws ... I feel so stupid, but I have the "advantage", I can always fallback to my username
AstroRookie
Don't worry, we all do stupid things. The most stupid thing is to say one doesn't do stupid things...😱
- 1
-
I agree the Baader solution is not cheap , but keep in mind that you will be able to use it on any future telescope with the right adapter.
- 1
-
The Baader clicklock system may work for you: Baader ClickLock 1.25" Adapter with T-2 Thread | First Light Optics
Maybe you will need a M43x1 male to T2 male converter to reach focus: Baader M43a x 1 / T-2a Adapter (e.g. for Vixen) (baader-planetarium.com) -
6 hours ago, Wish-It-To-The-Cornfield said:
Budget - yeah, whatever I can either hide from my wife or amount that she's good with, if deception is out of the question.
I see these kind of remarks frequently on these forums, alas ... whether they are meant as a joke or not, I think they are quite pitiful, deception should always be out of the question. They are condescending... Just be honest, that will bring a lot more joy on all levels.
-
As many already stated above: do not take any chances with your eyes, stick to the known to be safe brands.
Get yourself well educated about the use of any solar filter, being it white light or H-alpha, before using it.But you are already doing that... good for you!
- 1
-
The thing with RO water is that the pH is quite low and thus is acidic. Acidity can damage the metal coatings of your mirror
Distilled water is pH neutral so it can not damage the coatings on your mirror.
This: What Is The Difference Between Reverse Osmosis Water And Distilled Water? | Drinking Water Base will tell the story. -
And please be more than careful with a hammer close to optics...
-
On 21/02/2021 at 16:02, Orange Smartie said:
Now I know little bit more about telescopes, I thought I'd take the mirror cell out of my old Konus 114mm reflector. The primary is filthy and could do with a proper clean when I can get hold of some deionized water. I was amazed just how much force was required to remove/replace it though - had to actually tap it with a hammer to force it off. The end of the steel tube is bent inwards to accommodate a mirror cell that is clearly slightly too small for the diameter of the tube.
Surely this is not normal?!
How filthy is your mirror? the rule of thumb is to not clean it when the dirt is less than 10% of the mirror's surface.
Cleaning a mirror is a tricky job and has to be done with great care.
Use distilled or even double distilled water, do not use de-ionized water. De-ionized water is water that lacks ions coming from sodium, calcium etc. It still may contain other organic stuff. Distilled water is purer. Double distilled water is super pure and also used for medical purposes. Last flush can be done with Acetone. It dissolves the remaining waterdrops and evaporates very fast and without residue. -
16 hours ago, CosmicRayResearcher said:
- Self levelling powered steering AZ mount that hit point to the Zenith with high accuracy (most important) and also point to any zenith/azimuth angle we may need.
- It would be great if it worked well with Linux
- Battery power is a plus but we will have 24V DC available for the laser already so it is not critical
- Can handle a payload which is ~10kg and 40cm long
- Is less than 1000€ before tax
i.m.h.o. these two are a non existing combination ...
Considering upgrading scope optical train- barlow and diagonal
in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
Posted
A chain is a strong as its weakest link... So everything depends on the quality of your scope.
Your scope sits in the top quality range I believe, so to get the best out of it, you should use top quality accessories as well.
TV PowerMates and Baader BBHS diagonals will get the best out your scope, and you will see the difference. Maybe you can borrow them from a nearby fellow astronomer or a club in the neighborhood to get a taste. I would lent you mines, if you were closer...
The PowerMate as well as the BBHS just seem to disappear and that is what you want...
Just my 2 €cents