Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Rush

Members
  • Posts

    201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rush

  1. Well,

    dithering + Lp filter is more essential than long cooling intervals in my experience.

    Keep ISO low, for instance 400, exposure time 120 seconds and shoot one or many nights the same object.

    Try not to use Live view screen. Its quiet true what mate Alacant says.

    On the other hand if u r really concerned about cooling the camera, use a table FAN and blow on the Camera :) at a slow rotation naturally.

    Cheers

    Rush

    • Like 1
  2. 2 hours ago, Adam J said:

    Never use a gain of less than 120 on the ASI294mc pro as it alters how it reads the pixels.

    Hi Adam,

     had this Camera for 6 months, tried the unity gain ( corresponding 120 s) in SGP. Result was extrem Col.noise and stars were kind of overexposed , RGB histogram by far misaligned .

    In the course of time, turned down the gain to 70 and from 300s to 180s and the C.noise dramaticaly went down . This is purely my expeirence. I cant try this again as I sold off this cam.

     Was trying to combine the lum from CCD with CMOS OSC. In the end I gave up,  lol.

    Adam , did you use this camera or did u check personaly how the gain values respond ? Curious 2 know, probably my handling was wrong. This was my low gain attempt HLRGB.

    cheers

    Rush

    717708674_IC1396copy.jpg.b7200d893b780e87dca9c76e988c3857.jpg

  3. On 20/06/2019 at 20:35, Kaydubbed said:

    Ah I use a ZWO set for now at 7nm  with my asi183mm and noticed my frames were soft in Ha detail on NGC7000 but I totally just blamed the poor transparency.  I should stop to F4 and see if I have improvements. I'm sure it will improve but k already regret that loss of light at F4!

    Added 3 hrs of Ha and O3 to the Sony DSLR image fully wide open at F2. My eyes cannot see the occilation nor the incoherence of the light signal.

    Cant say overall SNR s improved or aggravated the phase distortion by the filters . The colours look different and some of those dust lanes, star colours vanished :( and Nebula itself became more dense. 

    Baader 7 nm and Baader F/2 High speed O3 filter were used.

    CS

    Rush

    DSLR image

    489919531_Image37_ABEcopy.jpg.ef47876d8454d1424d6cce0b0390bb8d.jpg

    N band added.

    467109742_HORGB!copy.jpg.d6e706e6cc7ec03148ca1e7d91678557.jpg

     

    • Like 2
  4. 6 hours ago, rickwayne said:

     just breathe and repeat The 183 Mantra:

      It calibrates out.

      It calibrates out.

      It calibrates out.

    But you certainly do want darks at exactly that gain, temp, and exposure!

    My Mantra is ,

    No califrames, No Califrames, No Califrames. go away amp glow :) . Dont ask me why , this is humming in my head every time i start processing, may be cos Im lazy.

     

    ASI294MC PRO  + Takumar 135 mm lens . HA /OXY injected to OSC. No Califrames🤩

    Takumar 135 mm lens makes halos around bright stars.Stars r not round my laziness with guiding.(used previous night caliberation )

    But was fun fiddling around with this OSC camera.

    CS

    Rush

    HALRGB.jpg.55ce8e617a4ce49c5f04dcc97c46ad7e.jpg

    HOOSC.jpg.2f141a79f7a5b77c95703da1bb4beba9.jpg

     

    • Like 1
  5. On 13/04/2019 at 10:22, laser_jock99 said:

    I've looked at buying this lens as a possible replacement for my ageing Nikon ED180 F2.8 which was the recomended fast widefield AP lens in its day.

    I don't want to hook it up to a CCD- so has anyone got any unprocessed, full frame DSLR images at F2 to post? I'd like to see if it is an improvement on the 'slow' old Nikon! And also how well it handles CA- one of the Nikons failings (on my lens at least) was issues with CA wide open. I found I had to stop down to F4 and use a Lumicom Minus Violet filter (almost half the cost I paid for the lens!!).

    This is a Sony full frame A7 in jpeg, If you want a raw frame i will add. Hope this helps,

    CS

    Rush

    DSC00065.thumb.JPG.cc23f8b62bd8da30027c90c6c6a809a8.JPG

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, Adreneline said:

    I've had my 135mm a year now and used it primarily with an Atik428ex and more recently a ASI1600MM-Pro.

    This is the Heart and Soul using the ASI1600; 15x120s + 15x180s at unity gain, offset 50. I really like the wide field of view offered by this combination.

    1998049949_2019-04-11-HeartSoul-4500s_Ha.thumb.jpg.f6fe9f5205dac33b3cc0d9a53bbd2420.jpg

    I use a fairly manual setup - manual filter change and semi-manual focussing using a homemade stepper motor system.

    IMG_8734.thumb.JPG.ad87e0988b01d8967364f9d3ef32120d.JPGIMG_8735.thumb.JPG.925d8cbb6fe7778c0bf719fad8d7603e.JPG

    Thanks for looking.

    Adrian

    Looks nice , i want to assemble a similar stepper motor focuser , but was unable to find that rubber belt. You have any idea where i can buy one of those.

    Once i had that filter tray , i replaced with Atik  ew 2. Makes the struggle a lot easier Adrian. With ASI 1600 a lot more easier attaching the electric filterwheel.

    Spacing is almost perfect.

    cheers

    Rush

    • Thanks 1
  7. On 10/04/2019 at 07:31, RolandKol said:

    Nah... he leaves no room for EFW and my autofocuser... 

    Plus his camera left hanging... I am almost sure it will introduce tilt... I saw one model on his web, were bracket at last Holds ASI1600MM properly,

    but this bracket will have no use for my Canon and even EFW!!!

     So if I will need to buy from him, I will end up with 2 brackets and with: + manual focus, +manual filter change.

    Not the way I want to go. :)

    My PDS is collimated, not perfect, but Close enough to make me happy :) 

    And we have plenty of Cloudy Nights to make a Proper Bracket with the place for all the automation my toys have and one for both cameras :)

    True , about autofocuser. but you can find  a way around. Filterwheel is not a problem , the one  i use s quiet heavy still it doesnt tilt in any direction.

    Two brackets comes with a Vixen style D.tail and the guidescope clamp acts as a reinforcement. Maybe on the reinforcement some modification to attach the A.focuser?

    image3.JPG.b11fea13d55108741f973f418df5d1d6.JPG

    image2.JPG.d9afe21802b0090c90c8345ece75aa64.JPG

  8. 11 hours ago, RolandKol said:

    At F2 exposures will be Strongly Location + Camera Dependant isn't it?

    I cannot go longer than 30sec @ISO100 with my Canon 1300D in Woolwich.... And ISO100 is very noisy...

    Thinking of stepping down to F4, till I manage to print my bracket/holder for ASI1600:)

    Use a LP filter screwd infront of the lens , works fine.

    Dithering is a must for DSLR,s. to reduce noise.

    B 4 u print out  bracket/ holder, buy from Phillipe in France. http://www.astrokraken.fr/samyang-135mm-f-2-c30078976,  well made , i use it.  hope this helps. This will provide you more time for PDS Collimation?135mm f:2 bracket + micro-focuser

    Par astrokraken le 2 Juillet 2018 à 00:33

    Samyang 135mm f:2 bracket + micro-focuserSamyang 135mm f:2 bracket + micro-focuser
    Samyang 135mm f:2 bracket + micro-focuserSamyang 135mm f:2 bracket + micro-focuser

    This bracket allows to mount your Samyang 
    135 f:2 telephoto lens on an equatorial mount 
    for astrophotography.

    A hinged micro-focuser ring has been mounted 
    on the lens, to fine

    • Like 1
  9. 12 hours ago, Knight of Clear Skies said:

    @Rush - Are you sure that image of the Pleiades and California was taken with the Samyang? That looks more like a 50mm shot to me.

    1000% :).

    Shot with Sony A7 and Samyang , around 15 frames  @ 300s iso 800.

    Cone N, with SBIG ST 8300 M .

    R & G ,3 frames @ 300s, B 6 frames  @  300s, Ha  12 frames  @ 600s.

    Rosette N , same as above.

    Cheers

     

  10. 3 hours ago, RolandKol said:

    It looks like you will not be able to see the primary mirror holders via Cheshire just like me! :)
    Have fun! :) hehe

    I hope I am not right :) as this makes life much more difficult....

    I even tried to place my ASI224MC directly into the draw-tube, as 224MC body is actually 2" and it fits perfectly,

    but... I did not like what I saw... Still cannot understand why the view was of-center...
    Will repeat it next week will post some pics.

    Swear i cant blame the drawtube or the eyepeace holder as Cheshire CT is held by a ring holder (no thumb screws)

    I wish too u r not right, it was hours when all this began, slowly its turning into days ?

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.