Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Dave In Vermont

Members
  • Posts

    5,694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Dave In Vermont

  1. 3 hours ago, D4N said:

    I would always be concerned about buying a scope if the person selling it has it set up for looking at the ground!

     

    However it is entirely possible it could be a nice little scope once you get it set up properly, there are a lot of bits wrong or missing in the image but hopefully they are included and the seller just didn't know how to put it all together.

    I was wondering how long it would take before someone pointed this out!

    Yes - it will help a bit to turn it around so the mirror is in the bottom position of the tube, with the focuser on top.

    Ya gotta love it...

    Dave

  2. Unitron is my first guess as well.

    I'll try to attach a Unitron 1972 Catalog in the post here. But I have a more likely Unitron Catalog from 1956 - which is over 20mgs - which I can't send through SGL. If you'd like that, I'll send you a PM to email me at. I'll be glad to send it to you through email

    unitron72.pdf

    Hope this works & watch for a PM,

    Dave

  3. Just a minor-point for our new members here: 'vacuum' is not the member's name. It's the 'Rank' of new folks. Just look above the Rank for the name. Example: I am 'Dave In Vermont.' 'Little Green Man' is my Rank. As is ccdfreak the name of the member.

    The more posts you make, the higher your Rank becomes to things like 'Nebula' and/or 'Proto Star.' Don't feel like you need apologize - we all managed to stumble into this error in the start! :p

    Have fun -

    Dave

  4. Meade AR-5 achromatic 127mm F/9.3 1182mm F.L.

     

    IMG_1150.JPG

     

    IMG_1151.JPG

     

    IMG_1152.JPG

     

    IMG_1154.JPG

     

    I just had a struggle in attaching - by means of a 2-pound rubber-mallet - a new visual back and 10:1 Crayford dual-focuser. Based on my report, the manufacturer (Antares) is having to re-design this item. I got it on, but a non-mechanic would easily have smashed their telescope in the process! It was a bear!

    Dave

    • Like 7
  5. Yes - I wouldn't take a gamble on this. Not if it spells out:

    WARNING! THESE FOCAL REDUCERS ARE DESIGNED STRICTLY FOR THE LNTECH CAMERAS, MODEL LN300 AND FOR OUR COOLED T-MOUNT CAMERAS. THEY WILL NOT WORK WITH ANY OTHER CAMERA WITHOUT MODIFICATION. THESE REDUCERS EMPLOY THE MOST AGGRESSIVE, HIGHEST REDUCTION FACTOR THAT IS POSSIBLE GIVEN THE TELESCOPE CHARACTERISTICS, CCD SIZE AND REDUCER TO SENSOR CORRECT SPACING. IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO MODIFY THE FOCAL REDUCERS TO WORK WITH OTHER 1/3" CCD CAMERAS. CONTACT US FOR MORE DETAILS. WE WILL NEED TO MEASURE YOUR CAMERA MOUNT-FLANGE TO SENSOR DISTANCE TO ANALYZE IF A SPACER COULD BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMODATE THE REDUCER REQUIREMENTS.

    MallinCam has an excellent 3.3 FR available, which I have. It's not 1.8, but it does work. I've bookmarked the site above to see if they do release a 1.8 for other systems.

    Thank you for the link!

    Dave

  6. For myself, the lure of video-ap is the intent to do it in any way one wishes to. Can you do a screenshot and, later on, stack them and process the daylight <koff!> out of them? Yes! Can you just let the camera feed, in realtime, to an external monitor? Yes! Can you use an expensive video-cam specializing in deep-space astro-objects that cost you over £1,000? Yes! Can you use a cheap web-cam that's only collecting dust & cobwebs? Yes!

    This is how video-ap tempted me to jump in. Now I've seen it splinter into two camps: Big £££ & top-end software-programs. The flying-by-frugal gear that anyone can afford - and succeed - in capturing beautiful images that are more than capable of causing jaws to drop! There are, simply put, no rules and room for any & all folks!

    That's my 2¢ - and I'm stickin' to it!

    Dave

    • Like 4
  7. No - this is not normal by any stretch. Having spikes on a star from the spider (as it's called due to it's 3 or 4 arms) is normal, but it shouldn't be blocking-out the object you're looking at.

    Frankly - I'm stumped. I'd look into the collimation of the optics. 'Collimate' is the word meaning to align in optics. The primary-mirror and the secondary-mirror should aligned center-to-center. I'll link you to one of the best guides to this by Astro_Baby, who is a member here:

    http://www.astro-baby.com/collimation/astro%20babys%20collimation%20guide.htm

    Have a good read,

    Dave

  8. First off - Greetings and welcome to SGL - it's nice that you've found us! Secondly - no need to apologize! We love helping folks find answers to their astro-related questions. It's how we all learn. As someone else coined: The only stupid questions are the one's you don't ask!

    A black dot on Jupiter, eh? May I ask what magnification you were using? There's a good reason to believe that your black-dot may have been a shadow from one of Jupiter's moons transiting the planet. Photograph below.

    Dave

    Jupiter and Europa Transit 02-23-2016.jpg

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.