Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Richard136

Members
  • Posts

    231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Richard136

  1. Hi all

    I'm looking for a helical focuser to assist in fine focusing. Ideally non-rotating, but will accept a rotating one.

    There's seemingly a huge array of these things and a bit confusing how to attach to the scope.

    I'm looking for either a 1.25, or preferably a 2" version, that simply fits into the standard 1.25" or 2" eyepiece slots. Alternatively something that screws directly onto the focuser of my scopes (but how to know what thread those use; have several scopes all with different threads?)

    Also: since these devices obviously lengthen the path, do they actually work for visual on refractors and Newt's? (assume CATs are fine since the mirror moves)

    Am lost in the woods atm in terms of threads and diameters, etc. Help?!

     

  2. 3 hours ago, Dave scutt said:

    I can't travel my dob is too big and heavy for me to get in my car. And there's a dark site 40 minutes away,  I'm observe from my garden bortle 3 ,a few trees facing south or should I say forest  but if I wheel my dob 5 minutes up the road I have this.20211024_142654.thumb.jpg.38af9f33ca369d24fda74f4e9501df85.jpg

    Nice!

    • Thanks 1
  3. Really interesting responses, guys. 

    I've been scoping my village and found some darker spots quite nearby; and that give a wider view of the sky, too. May try them at some point. The road is my cul de sac would actually be pretty good once all neighbours are in bed, but we have two street lights that stay on all night.

  4. Just wondering how many of you observe away from the house / garden, e.g., to a dark lane nearby or other dark place.

    My garden is relatively dark, but the nearby houses and trees mean the view of the sky is quite obstructed in certain directions.

    How many of you venture off into the night to find a dark spot without obstructions?

    • Like 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Stu said:

    I’m in exactly the opposite situation as the first two posters, I never used my AZEQ6 in EQ mode. I’m purely a visual observer so find AltAz much more convenient as it keeps the eyepiece in the same orientation as you know.

    I assume you would either be imaging or observing in any one session? You may find if doing a lot of AP then you end up leaving it on EQ mode so as to keep your PA reasonably accurate and only requiring tweaks.

    In my experience it is a very capable mount, far more so than the AZEQ5, and it carried some fairly crazy kids when I was observing with mine. This was a C8 Edge and a 150mm f9 apo doublet weighing 20kg! Must have been the hot summer, looking at the grass. 2015.

    FDDA56D3-A5BE-4EDE-A558-10E588782007.jpeg

    30E4738D-B966-450F-B92B-FE2F61184E53.jpeg

    What's the mounting hardware underneath the C8? Is that how ensure both scopes point same direction?

  6. I'd say its worth the extra. 

    I got one second hand and it's a very strong unit. Largest capacity alt az I could find without going for the Rowan Az100.

    The latitude adjustment on the eq mode is easy, and the option for two scopes is just great.

    There isn't a handle, and it's a difficult-to-hold shape and weight. I think that's the trade off

  7. Hi

    I am looking for a cable to perform firmware update on a Celestron SE 8.

    My pc only has USB ports.

    The SE8 has Star Sense handcontorler, which, I believe (?) has an RJ22 socket on the bottom. It's not the USB version.

    Can someone advise which cable to use to perform the update?

    Thanks in advance 

  8. Hi all

    I'm thinking of getting a heavy scope and riding it on the Sky Tee2. Question is what is the *true* max that mount can take?

    Before I purchase the scope I need to be sure it'll fit on the mount.

    total weight will probably be close to 20KG. Obviously I will need to add counterwieghts and a Losmandy clamp, but will the mount take it?

  9. The best scope is the one you use. Agreed.

    Should add that the WO110 FLT I used to own was no problem to whip outside at a moments notice.

    My other question is why the similarity in price for a significant difference in aperture between the 107 and the 130?

    The TSOptics 107 (or the SharpStar for that matter) are also comparable price to the 130. So the 130 is either a bargain, or perhaps priced to reflect it's narrower appeal due to portability limitations. (?)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.