-
Posts
13,036 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Merlin66
-
-
I understand...
That's why I suggested focusing the Lodestar (using the telescope focusser) first - just to confirm 100% it's seeing the light beam and can indeed focus on your system.
Then review the imaging camera to see how far you have to move the telescope focusser to bring it into focus - the difference is what you need to address with the Lodestar positioning.
- 1
-
I assume your set-up is OAG>filter wheel>ASI 1600..... Roughly what's the distance from the centre of the OAG to the imaging plane? 55,60mm??
Does the Lodestar "usually" work OK? ie when imaging on it's own?
If everything else checks out I'd work backwards - ignore the imaging camera for the moment and get the lodestar to focus.... then move the Lodestar in/out the OAG until it's close to your measure 55-60(?) and retest the Lodestar focus when it works OK, then look at the imaging focus .... one small adjustment to the imaging camera, one small adjustment to the Lodestar - repeat until success.
- 1
-
I currently use the ZWO ASI 174MM for solar imaging, and I'm awaiting delivery (on back order) of an ASI 183MM to use on the shorter focal length scopes (to give easier full disk images)
I use FireCapture V2.6 for acquisition, AutoStakker V3 for quality stacking the AVI files and Registax 5 (I find it better than Registax6 at times) for the application of wavelets.
-
SharpCap or FireCapture work well with the ASI cameras.
Yes, you can run effective "live view" - just change the exposure to show sufficient detail.
(I use an ASI 174MM with a SM60/ED80 for solar imaging, but about to buy a ASI 183MM)
-
Over the years I’ve used many SCT - from all the variations and sizes of the Meade LX200 series and now the Celestron 9.25 and C11.
although not perfect, they were all fit for purpose.
The C11 I currently use displays good Ronchi lines and adequately meets my needs for precision spectrography.
-
Hmmm, that still shows a significant LED pollution in the filter transmission bandwidths.....
-
Unfortunately the broad spectrum LED can't effectively be filtered out.
Where you have transmission bands (Hb, OIII, Ha etc) you will also have background LED light pollution.......
-
A couple of comments:
The link mentioned refers to IR not UV.....
Shining a high intensity IR LED "searchlight" at the camera filter bears little resemblance to actual user conditions.......
(In the diagram filter#2 is the one removed and Filter#1 -the anti alias/ dust shake filter is usually retained.)
The attached PDF file shows real spectroscopic transmission tests done on the front filter.....
The final IR transmission is not much worse than that found in the original Canon camera ....................
- 1
-
-
OK.
The UV-IR has no affect on the amount or intensity of the Ha transmitted through the Quark.
It just reduces the energy loading on the Quark itself.
- 2
-
The “UV/IR and diagonal” reference is under the larger aperture (above 80mm) section of the document......
-
Pig,
Sorry to correct you.....
It appears NO addition energy rejection is necessary with apertures less than 80mm
- 1
-
Yes, but it really depends on the size of your refractor...above 110mm aperture an ERF or at least a good UV/IR filter is needed.
-
Thanks!
Unfortunately the Spectra-L200 is no longer in production.
-
I designed the original OVIO multi-slit plate for the Spectra-L200.
Yes, with a suitable transfer lens and the slit inclined at 15 deg you see the 6mm long slit gap and the reference number.
Check out our website for more info. http://www.astronomicalspectroscopy.com/instrument.html
- 1
-
I use the DMK 21 618 for a while.
Higher QE at Ha than the standard version, but very small webcam sized chip.
There are better options availed today.
(I still use my DMK 41 and DMK51)
- 1
-
OK, you're on the right track.
I use the ASI 174MM for solar - pixel size suits my set-up and the frame rates are FAST!!!
The newer ASI 178MM would be a good bet.
You'll need a USB3 connection and a fast SSD drive to collect the data (2-3Gb per session)
Acquisition and processing.....FireCapture or SharpCap will give you good AVI (or SER) file to allow stacking for quality. Registax 6 or Autostakker V2/V3 will do the necessary stacking and "tweaking"
Any photo imaging program (PainShopPro, PS etc. etc.) can be used to apply the colourisation....
http://www.sharpcap.co.uk/sharpcap
- 1
-
You are correct.
My 100mm was an approximation.
- 1
-
No, they are for WL enhancement......
If you eventually use a larger refractor (>100mm) , then with the Quark you may need an ERF (energy rejection filter) - a good UV-IR filter as a basic option.
- 1
-
I enjoy both visual and solar imaging.
Yes, over a period of minutes you can see the development of the proms and movements around sun spots and active areas.
Imaging a sequence with an image say every five minutes over a period of a couple of hours dramatically shows the dynamic nature of the proms and the solar surface in general.
- 2
-
Hmmmm
That’s a little unkind for a $ 2000 investment in Ha solar filters.....
- 1
-
My experience with tilt tuned etalons is slightly different....takes a bit of finesse but the results are just as good as those I saw through a double stacked Lunt.
(I had a "fine tuning knob" on my external double stacked SM60 filters - a Vegemite lid controlled from the eyepiece.)
- 4
-
I ordered a Quark when they first came out and then had to cancel the order when DayStar could not confirm that it would work in ambient temperatures above 40 deg C.
The Quark only has heating to bring it on band (I believe the "nominal" operating temperature is around 28 deg )
The temperature down here in Victoria was 44 deg yesterday!
- 1
-
Lodestar 2 and OAG
in Discussions - Cameras
Posted
Hmmmm
If the focus travel is longer than the backfocus of your OAG>Fliterwheel>ASI 1600 then you should have found a Lodestar focus - somewhere.
Have you tried the Lodestar on another telescope to verify the settings - exposure etc.
I use the Lodestar (under PHD2 - Latest Ascom driver) to guide my spectroscope using a "similar" oag set-up on a C11 at f10.........